* Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett <[email protected]> [Feb 22. 2010 10:38]: > > I have noticed the following: > > Our code depends on rubygem-relevance-rcov, which is a package that follows a > now obsolete github convention. I have packaged rubygem-rcov.
Thats because the official rcov was unmaintained and branched by relevance. I haven't followed rcov too closely in the past, we should check the upstream status before renaming the package. > > Would it be feasible to replace it for this iteration? > > Also we have ruby-rpam which is based on > http://gitorious.org/opensuse/yast-rest-service/trees/master/rpam > > It seems now rpam is even released as a gem from its author (Sept 2009). I > have packaged it as rubygem-rpam, should we switch to it? I see no problems with that. > > Then we have ruby-polkit, which I would also look into make it a rubygem too. > But I have no progress here. That's our own little extension, needing some love anyways ;-) Klaus --- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
