* Ladislav Slezak <[email protected]> [Apr 13. 2010 10:39]:
> 
> The problem is in which package it should be placed? I originally thought
> about webyast-base-ui and webyast-base-ws. But that would prevent from 
> sharing the
> macros between WS and UI, some macros would be duplicated.
> 
> Another (IMO better) solution is to put the macros to 
> rubygem-webyast-rake-tasks
> package.

Yes, this seems the right place for now.

In the future, we might think about a generic "webyast-devel" package
(and possibly an associated 'webyast-testsuite' package) as a
catch-all for development/build-time related stuff.


> 
> I think that exactly this problem is addressed in bug #537406 "[task] unify 
> packaging
> of webYaST packages".
> 

You might want to reach out to [email protected] who's currently working
on generating .spec files for the build service. I could imagine
coming up with a DSL (domain specific language) for this task.
(See e.g. http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/06/dsl-or-not)


Klaus
---
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to