-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dne 18.8.2011 14:25, Josef Reidinger napsal(a):
> Ideas for other names:
> yast_agent
> configkit (there is still not enough kits :)
> yast_kit
> config_agent
> system_kit
>
> more ideas? Also singular or plural to unify it?
One question that comes to my mind: Do we really need to call it
.*agent.*? Isn't that rather kind of API used for accessing (r/w) system
configuration files? Why not to base the name on the functionality it
provides?
1.) 'system' and/or 'config[uration]' in the name would say what it
provides.
2.) I already have enough kits ;) Thank you!
3.) Let's not use 'yast'. I thought we wanted to reuse that library
whenever possible. Not only in YaST.
On the other hand ... system_config might sound too close to sysconfig.
Bye
Lukas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk5NK3oACgkQVSqMdRCqTizsqACgml0VKdr7LuXyvlNQ+jPm/OGp
WW0AoJzdRB1SD9Rwgh5lGiOPa8ywlK1V
=Fi9E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
