Thomas Goettlicher write:
> On Friday, September 02, 2011 12:55:22 pm Lukas Ocilka wrote:
> > Dne 2.9.2011 11:12, Thomas Goettlicher napsal(a):
> > >> YaST++/-- is just codename for project. Packages ( now located at
> > >> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=YaST%3AHead%3Ayastpp (
> > >> not all packages packaked yet, WIP ) has own names, which is not
> > >> problem for RPM. Josef
> > > 
> > > The project's name is 'YaST++', in git it's called 'yast--' and the
> > > buildservice projects is 'yastpp'. That's somehow inconsistent and might
> > > confuse newbies. I'd prefer a unique name.
> > 
> > YaST++ is the same comparing to YaST2 as C++ to C :) At least that's how
> > I understand the codename.
> Yes, YaST++ is YaST2 incremented by one. Please don't call it YaST3!
>  
> > yastpp just translates the ++ to pp, IMO ++ in RPM is OK as several C++
> > packages with ++ in their RPM name are already in our distro.
> As long as + or - don't cause conflicts I'm fine with it. But you never know. 
> 
> > I'm also for unification, but I believe ++ is not an issue.
> The earlier, the better. The question is if the new name should/must contain 
> the word 'yast". On the one hand it would be a good point in time for a new 
> name in order to abandon all these silly myths like "yast is slow and 
> overwrites files" cited by people who haven't used YaST for years. One the 
> other hand the brand "YaST" has a great reputation in the community and among 
> system administrators. According to them is YaST _the_ configuration tool 
> that 
> makes the difference. That's the reason why I think we should stick with the 
> name "YaST".
> 
> Cheers,
> Thomas
> 

Well, I don't care much about names, but to prevent confusion, YaST++/--/pp is 
not YaST2! YaST++ is project more likely to separate functionality from 
representation and for easy share. So it is possible ( and expected) that in 
future there will be together yast++, Yast for representation on desktop and 
WebYaST for representation on web and other possible users of functionality. If 
you know better name I welcome it and start using it ( as I said, I don't care 
much about names, more about functionality and usability ).
Josef


-- 
Josef Reidinger
Appliance Toolkit team
maintaining parts of webyast and SLMS
author of rubygems - studio_api and net_observer (coauthor)
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to