On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:22:34 +0100 Ancor Gonzalez Sosa <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/12/2015 11:56 AM, Josef Reidinger wrote: > > > > What do you think about it? Do you find more useful helpers? And > > what is more important how looks your ui tests, so I can check what > > is same and can be shared? > > To be honest, I don't remember to have written tests for UI in YaST. > All I can say is that I'd like them be as interaction-oriented as the > tests with Capybara in Rails, for example: > > https://github.com/openSUSE/travel-support-program/blob/master/spec/features/user_profile_spec.rb > > In the example, feature==describe, background==before, scenario==it. > > I'll do some experiments next week. We all probably need to write > quite some tests for UI before being really able to design a good set > of helpers. > > Cheers. Well, what I see in example you post is more integration tests of ui, not unit tests. It looks really similar to e.g. cucumber for me. I think in unit tests you need more test interaction of units in program then effects for user. So for me unit tests is more test if it properly set configuration in conf class then what user see. But I agree with you, that it make sense to everyone try write some tests to get idea what is missing and make pain in writing such tests. Josef -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
