On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 13:23:31 +0100 Stefan Hundhammer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18.11.2015 12:32, Arvin Schnell wrote: > > But it shows that the concept of 'we have to test everything' > > does not work in practice. So any help from static code analysis > > tools should be welcomed or to quote John Carmack "it is > > irresponsible to not use it" [1]. > > Looks like there are a lot of tools that do purely formal stuff like > Rubocop, i.e. enforcing if your blanks and empty lines are set > correctly, but not very many that concentrate on technical issues. > > One I just found with a 5 minute Google search was this: > > https://github.com/YorickPeterse/ruby-lint > > Has anybody here tried that before? Maybe it's useful for us. > > > Kind regards I don't try it, but looks interesting. I just do not think we should make it "hard" requirement (like do not submit package when something found). More like hints what can go wrong as for ruby with meta programming only think you can say for sure, is that everything can be changed :) Josef -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
