On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:12:05 +0200 Martin Vidner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 06:59:13AM +0100, Imobach González Sosa wrote: > > During the past openSUSE Conference, some members of the YaST team > > (Áncor, Christopher, HuHa, Knut, Josef and myself -alphabetical > > order, excuse me if I forgot anyone) discussed about YaST2 code > > reorganization. > > > > The outcomes of such a discussion are summarized in this document: > > https:// > > gist.github.com/imobach/d90940315bd0471ee00b2a68ba22fbe5#proposal > > > > Obviously the discussion is still open so, please, feel free to > > comment and bring up new ideas. > > Have you considered going all the way and packaging our repos as > gems? You know, gemspec, gem2rpm, rpm. > > Maybe the parts with C++, cough Perl cough, would be harder, but it > should be easy for pure Ruby, once we conform to the conventions as > proposed above. > > I think the benefit would be that bundler could set up things that > we now need to do in VMs. Yes, we consider it and reason why not is still same. yast module contain beside lib also other parts like clients, modules, autoyast schemas and others, which cannot be packaged as gem, as we cannot get them into correct location. If you find reasonable way, to package it into gem, we can reopen discussion. Josef
pgpyxln1yIjI6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
