On 2/4/19 9:04 AM, José Iván López González wrote:
> So, due to the tools are available for all architectures, I guess we
> should not limit Bcache to x86. Of course, we would receive bugs because
> bcache tools does not behave correctly, but we could simply forward such
> bugs to bcache. Another option would be to restrict bcache actions only
> to x86.

The options must be restricted. This is the Product Management answer to
the current status of bcache tools:

> - we *must not* build the tools on non_x86_64
> - we must open feature requests in JIRA for s390
> - we must open feature request for ARM and power

So don't even expect bcache-tools to be available in the short term.

> Fr the rest of archs, bcache devices would only be listed> but no actions 
> could be performed over them. Opinions?

No actions allowed. That's for sure. About displaying it, that's a more
complex question.

Cheers.

> 
> 
> On 2/1/19 4:48 PM, Ancor Gonzalez Sosa wrote:
>> For those involved in the bcache support in storage-ng, this is Coly's
>> answer to the question about the current status in all archs.
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Re: Fate#325346 - bcache in non-x86_64 architectures
>> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 00:35:11 +0800
>> From: Coly Li <[email protected]>
>>
>> On 2019/2/1 5:56 下午, Ancor Gonzalez Sosa wrote:
>>>
>>> By the way, Coly, I have a question about that. Assuming bcache is not
>>> production-ready in all architectures (which may be true or not,
>>> that's still an open question) - Are the bcache-tools available in all
>>> architectures, including those in which the technology doesn't work
>>> that well?
>>
>> Bcache-tools can run on non-x86_64 platform, at least other people and I
>> run them on s390x. The problem is, bcache code, everywhere, assume the
>> machine is x86_64, even in formatting a bcache device, it does not
>> handle bit order in meta data structures, and the checksum calculation
>> order is wrong on big endian machines. So I would answer, bcache tools
>> can run on all architectures, but they are only available (behave
>> correctly) on x86_64 at this moment.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>


-- 
Ancor González Sosa
YaST Team at SUSE Linux GmbH
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to