What you're saying is that the working class should tailor its demands and
expectations to accommodate the hypocrisy of the DA. The DA has no
credibility in this matter and we should leave them out of it. It's a pity
that they got in first because really, we communists should have been much
faster than them in raising this issue. 

 

I have made no cry for cheap government. Quite the contrary, I have called
only for our representatives to live in and face the same conditions as the
rest of this, knowing that this is a good way to speed up government
spending on popular needs. 

 

And this idea of making accountability material is not my idea. Look at marx
on the paris commune again, and read the state and revolution properly. 

 

It's a sad and false piece of double-speak that equates a minister's fancy
car with defence of the working class revolution. The decidedly
anti-revolutionary message is that we need expert elites to bring us
socialism, whose expertise somehow deserves greater material reward.

 

And by the way, I'm a marxist, not an anarchist. 

 

  _____  

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dominic Tweedie
Sent: 11 September 2009 08:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Fwd: [COSATU Press] COSATU says No to
ministers' expensive cars

 


Rosa Luxemburg, responding in 1900 (in "Reform or Revolution") to Eduard
Bernstein's 1899 book "Evolutionary Socialism", wrote that Bernstein had
done the world a favour, because not only had he for the first time openly
made a virtue of class-collaboration, but he had also said everything that
could possibly be said in its favour, which Luxemburg quickly disposed of.
Subsequent history has proved Luxemburg correct about Bernstein, the prophet
of reformism. 
  
In his "The State and Revolution", in 1917, Lenin also took Bernstein's
renegade work as a reference point, but in addition remarked that the
"opportunists" (that is the reformists; the class-collaborationists; the
liberals) are the "twin brothers" of the "anarchists" (that is, the
petty-bourgeois ultra-lefts). This, too has always proved to be the case,
and is once again shown to be true in South Africa's new liberal/anarchist
"car wars" brouhaha. 
  
Long before Lenin and Luxemburg, Karl Marx had noted that every bourgeois is
ready to take up the cry for cheap government, while at the same time
wanting to use the state to the maximum for tenders and contracts, and
caring nothing for the hypocrisy of shouting for both of these contradictory
demands at the same time. That has not changed, either. 
  
All of this can be clearly seen in the "car wars" episode. 
  
Some of our reformists on this forum, and no doubt the reformists in COSATU,
as well, think that having legitimised the DA's liberal argument, and having
thereby opened a Pandora's box, they can seize upon the last remaining
pestilence - hope - and thereby wish away the ills that they have unleashed.

  
But they will not be able to wish these ills away. Instead, this monster is
going to grow, and it will overshadow all their other efforts in the
bourgeois public realm, including the COSATU Congress as a whole, unless
they are exceedingly lucky. And why should the DA let them have that luck? 
  
Our resident anarchist, Claire Ceruti, is also caught in a pact with the
liberal DA devil, in exactly way that Lenin predicted for all such
anarchists. "Too much!" she scolds, echoing the DA. 
  
Now it only remains for the DA to press the button again, and Ceruti is
forced to support them again. Sure enough, the very next day, the DA does
just that, and the bourgeois media amplifies the cry. Now there are letters,
op-eds, and Zapiro, and dozens of reporters are out looking for new ways to
denounce government expenditure of all kinds. 
  
For our reformists and anarchists there is no controllable end to this,
comrades. They have made a tacit pact with the devil and they must now go on
a devil's ride to hell. 
  
The right wing is not going to leave this alone. The end of the matter, as
Rosa Luxemburg noted, is only one: revolution. Until then, there are two
kinds of people in this political world. There are the falsely-moralising
liberals and anarchists on the one side, and there are the communists on the
other. 
  
As communists we are used to being told to apologise for existing. There has
never been a time when we did not have this nonsense thrown at us. 
  
The people who have been most perceptive in this YCLSA discussion are Lucky
Masuku and before him, Samson Zondi, who wrote: The Defense for the GS
equals the Defense of the Working Class Struggle! 
  
That is correct, and it is vital that the defence of the working class
struggle gets into gear now, and does not slacken again at any time between
now and Christmas. 
  
May we be victorious again in Polokwane! Down with the opportunists and the
anarchists! The struggle continues! 
  
VC 
  
 



LUCKY MASUKU wrote: 


Cadres 

 

You see, the manner in which some of us think leaves a lot to be desired, I
honestly think that some of us are not either honest or objective when
discussing this matter, in the first place you must really ask yourself as
to how did this matter link into the media and beyond that wether the were
any wrong doing by the department concern in purchasing the car.

 

beforre you actually give names to our own senior leaders, for you
information the minister does not buy any car rather the beaurocrats are the
one responsible for that, and this is indeed done in line with the
ministerial handbook, I think the department concern has clarified this
issue as to the processes that unfolded. it must be noted that the
department followed all the procedure in the of the PFMA in terms of
ensuring that our communist leader is indeed safe,

 

The recession did not at any stage thaught us that we must infact compromise
the life of our leaders in the interest saving. the life of the state
leaders in any countries are being put first hence they are provided with
VIP security 24 hrs and their houses are also secured by VIP security, this
is the responsibilty of every state in the world. it is strange that our own
so called communist would have the problem when a department chooses to
ensure that as per the guidelines of the ministerial handbook, its minister
is provided with a safe and reliable car, that will ensure that he execute
his duties without any technical problem from the vehicle, hence this cars
are put a blue light.

 

You see, the greatest enemy of the National Democratic Revolution is infact
our own comrade, this comrade infact do not have any argument with regard to
the car, infact they want to raise their own dissatisfaction of the SG being
deployed by the ANC to the government and this are people who works day a
night and try their best to destroy our own progressive cadres within the
movement,

 

The issue of the SG being deployed in governement its a Party issue and not
for this forum, this cadres if they are members of the party and they have a
problem with that, they must raise their dissatisfaction to their branches,
rather try and deal with character assassination here, 

 

infact this cadres if they are indeed progressive cadres, they should have
been discussing as to how best can we support the office of the SG in the
COSATU House so as to ensure that the work of the party continues, for their
iformation, that office has been thus far stregthen to merely deal with
their concern.

 

while we acknowledge that this is the constitutional matter but as
communist, we would one day want to see the SACP leading the South African
State, are we saying that when we reach that stage we must have two centred
of powers, NO! i do not think so leaders,

 

infact we were supposed to be proctecting the SG against this tendencies of
the special type which has started again, because honestly that is not the
SG car rather its  a Government car.

 

Amandla  

--- On Thu, 9/10/09, Mamphekgo,Steve (GPDPR)
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
wrote:


From: Mamphekgo,Steve (GPDPR)  <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Fwd: [COSATU Press] COSATU says No to
ministers' expensive cars
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009, 12:44 PM

Mxo, u r correct mchana. I think our comrades (Cabinet Ministers) must
lead by example. There is no excuse for our own trusted comrades to fall
into the bourgeoisie tendencies of fancy cars and lavish lifestyles,
whilst our people are trapped in abject poverty. Comrades must just
swallow their pride and take those cars back. 

COSATU is correct, whether the DA shares the same views or not, by
making a public call for the return of the fancy cars. Comrades
shouldn't have, in the first place, behaved in an unbecoming manner that
will have most of our people sharing the same views with the
reactionaries elements such as the DA. But we just can't condone these
actions on the basis that we are afraid of finding ourselves sharing the
same views with the DA. We know for the fact that ours, as progressive
revolutionaries, is a principled matter we are raising, whilst the
opposition is just being opportunistic as usual. But I blame our
comrades for having allowed the DA and other reactionary forces space to
make noise.

Let them take back those cars, finish and klaar. We are not going to be
black-mailed into defending the wrongs just because they were committed
by our own comrades.

As communists we are fighting against societal inequalities, we are
fighting for a just world and ensuring that everybody meets his/her
basic needs, not luxuries. Let the ministers also do with what is basic
to necessitate them to execute their responsibilities.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
<http://us.mc313.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
om>  
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mxolisi Mlatha
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 9:08 AM
To: [email protected]
<http://us.mc313.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
om>  
Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Fwd: [COSATU Press] COSATU says No to
ministers' expensive cars



Comrades

The issue of cars has now become such a big public issue
for Ministers. One cannot phathom the indiscretion on the
part of some of our comrades who continue to order
expensive cars. Let our comrades be brave and return the
cars, we need to encourage modest expenditure.

Mxolisi
---
Sent from UnionMail Service [http://mail.union.org.za]




Disclaimer:

This message may contain confidential information and is intended only for
the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete
this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
secured or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender
therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the
content of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. The
Gauteng Provincial Government does not take responsibility for Gauteng
Provincial Government users' personal views. Gauteng Provincial Government
services available online at: www.gautengonline.gov.za
<http://www.gautengonline.gov.za/>  










--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to