----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Jeje Yaqub <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, March 19, 2010 6:51:27 PM
Subject: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] Why is Floyd Shivambu digging for dirt on  
journos?


I think some will want us to treat Floyd's personal response to cde Domza as a 
view of the YL,like they usually do when chickens comes home to roast. Cde 
Floyd has correctly quoted Marx on the question of the dominant ideas in every 
epoch, again he is correct to say the media is reactionary and it also serves 
the interests of the ruling class. The fundamental question that comes to mind 
is, what fraction of the state does the opposite of what the media does. 
Without making an application of being called ultra left, I find it seriously 
disturbing when cdes becomes selective on issues. I differ fundamentally with 
anyone who thinks that journalists and not the media, serves the interests of 
the ruling class. This is the same mistake or ideology error made by uTrotsky 
saying police(workers in the armed forces) cannot be working class as they 
serve the enemy class. The question is not about where are you employed but 
about the entire class struggle. And in
 any case the working class comprise of the workers (journalists included) and 
the poor, therefore such cannot be seen as reactionary by anyone who claims to 
be communist.

Cde Floyd, i would not entertain your position about the role played by cde VC 
for history has taught me not to engage on petty struggles for such might 
alienate one from the entire collective. As you state that journalists are 
agents of capitalists, I'm not sure what informs your undialectical conclusion 
but however I don't believe you might think that workers are agents of the 
bourgeoisie simply because of the conditions they find themselves in. If cde 
Floyd were to be reminded or taught, the struggle is not waged on conditions of 
our own making (we do not choose the material conditions).  

Can cde Floyd or anyone who thinks journalists are agents of capitalism please 
inform me what role is parliament playing in this whole debacle.
Is parliament not advancing the interest of the bourgeoisie, is our liberal 
education system not serving as agents of capitalist mental reproduction. Is it 
not maximization of profit through maximum exploitation that ensures capitalism 
remains the order of the day. Can capitalism exploit its own agents and if so, 
then what is the role of communists as they happen to be the vanguard of the 
working class. Is it not the intention of the bourgeoisie to divide the 
proletariat (journalists included) so that the program of making them more 
docile and easier to exploit economically can be realised without any 
resistance.

If journalists and any worker serving in any section of the state are to be 
seen as agents of capitalism, then who stands to be mobilized by the communists 
in our struggle for socialism. Cde Floyd's analysis are absolutely inaccurate, 
they in fact serve the purpose of the bourgeoisie as they seek to alienate some 
sections of the workers from the entire working class contingent. Cde Floyd 
appears to me as an ideology vendor of every description, who is more mobilized 
than ever to convince young people that our only struggle is to defeat 
journalists and be good citizens. There has been a major shift from the side of 
Floyd as a communist into the ranks of our class enemies. Journalism can not be 
seen by young people as a reactionary career simply because of the apolitical 
and unscrupulous attitude of the YL towards journos.

Let us refrain from confusing personality cults with umzabalazo for such 
defeats the overall objective of all revolutionaries.
Cde Floyd consciously chose individuals and friends at the expense of the 
revolution. He has forgotten the main reasons that made him join the 
revolution, but in anycase the reasons initially had nothing to do with 
personality cult or bling, they had everything to do with the interests of 
workers that he chose to intimidate now of late. I therefore recommend that cde 
Floyd should undergo a process of self cultivation in order to save himself and 
any other young communist lost in the process. His primary goal has never been 
bourgeois democracy but socialism which I still believe is.

Get your facts straight commandante and vacate the area you find yourself in, 
for it does you no good but corrupts your soul.

Marx also said that "workers of the world unite" and such includes anyone who 
owns no means of production but live by selling his/her capacity to work And 
journalists meet the criteria.

Remember cdes not to qoute Marx or any other great revolutionary in a selective 
manner, for such is the recipe of distortion and fabrication. It will also 
result one in to being a revisionist of the worst kind that I doubt you may 
want to be.


The media serves the same purpose as parliament does and cde Floyd's silence on 
the latter is very loud. The last time I checked, it was the state that serves 
as a machinery to protect




________________________________
From: Nyiko Floyd Shivambu <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, March 18, 2010 1:01:02 PM
Subject: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] Why is Floyd Shivambu digging for dirt on  
journos?


"The individuals composing the ruling class possess among other things 
consciousness, and therefore think. Insofar, therefore, as they rule as a class 
and determine the extent and compass of an epoch, it is self-evident that they 
do this in its whole range, hence among other things rule also as thinkers, as 
producers of ideas, and regulate the production and distribution of the ideas 
of their age: thus their ideas are the ruling ideas of the epoch"......
 
This stems from a correct scientific discovery by a revolutionary scientific 
socialist, Karl Marx, whose correct observation was that "the ideas of a the 
ruling class are in every epoch, the ruling ideas". I am now worried that 
Dominic (whom you refer to as VC) is misguiding 'commmunists" to defend 
Journalists, who in a capitalist society are agents of the capitalist mental 
reproduction. factionalism has potential to annihiliate our organisation.
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .


      

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
yclsa-eom-forum+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the 
words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.

Reply via email to