It will be very interesting to see who will take over from Cde Vavi.
In the last congress comrade Vavi indicated that he wont stand for
re-election just like Cde JZ. I however think that it is imperative
for COSATU to strategically elect one of the two comrades ( Jim or
Baleni) as the Deputy secretary of COSATU in the upcoming congress.

Soso----WC

On 12/15/11, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Surely NUMSA would certainly do that.... Haaibo it's obvious...
>
> I hope the Central Committee sat well...
>
> Madala..
> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dominic Tweedie <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:05:37
> To: <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Numsa backs Vavi’s position on
>       secrecy bill - Business Day
>
>
> Business Day
>
>
> *Numsa backs Vavi’s position on secrecy bill*
>
> *
> *
> *Sibongakonke Shoba and Alistair Anderson, Business Day, Johannesburg,
> 15 December 2011*
>
> THE National Union of Metalworkers of SA (Numsa) yesterday moved to
> defend Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) general secretary
> Zwelinzima Vavi on the Protection of State Information Bill, saying
> there was a need to maintain a balance between withholding sensitive
> state information and making it public through the media.
>
> Mr Vavi has strongly opposed the bill in its current form — insisting a
> public interest clause be inserted before it is signed into law by
> President Jacob Zuma. This has angered some within the African National
> Congress-led tripartite alliance. The South African Communist Party
> (SACP) has criticised Mr Vavi’s position on the matter.
>
> However, Cosatu unions are backing their leader’s position. Numsa
> general secretary Irvin Jim said yesterday that the union supported Mr
> Vavi’s position. "The central committee of Numsa is fully in agreement
> with the latest position as articulated by the general secretary of
> Cosatu in relation to the information bill," he said.
>
> "There is a need to introduce a public interest defence that would
> maintain a balance between the restrictions legitimately placed on state
> information against disclosures and media publication of such
> information in the public interest," Mr Jim said.
>
> He said Mr Vavi was being singled out when opposition to the bill was a
> Cosatu decision.
>
> This was also confirmed by National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) spokesman
> Lesiba Seshoka.
>
> "We have a collective view at Cosatu that the bill needs a public
> interest defence. We do not want the bill to threaten our democracy," Mr
> Seshoka said.
>
> South African Municipal Workers Union (Samwu) spokesman Tahir Sema also
> agreed, saying Cosatu was "strongly opposed to the bill in its current
> form".
>
> But the bill appears to be deepening divisions in the already fractious
> political tripartite alliance.
>
> All alliance partners — the SACP, Cosatu and the ANC — are scheduled to
> elect new leaders next year.
>
> This is causing divisions in all three formations.
>
> This week, the National Education, Health and Allied Workers Union said
> it preferred the current leadership of both SACP and Cosatu to be retained.
>
> The NUM is reported to have taken a similar stance.
>
> Mr Sema said Samwu members had not discussed Cosatu leadership issues as
> this would be premature.
>
> "We fully support the current leadership," he said.
>
> "As a union we have not seen a need to discuss leadership. Any talks are
> premature.
>
> "We have not discussed who we would have lead, or if we would bring any
> Samwu member to national leadership position."
>
> Should Mr Vavi not stand for reelection as general secretary, Mr Jim is
> understood to be one of the leaders eyeing his position.
>
> Numsa has always come to Mr Vavi’s defence and is expected to back him
> on whichever position he decides to stand for.
>
> However, NUM general secretary Frans Baleni is also rumoured to be keen
> on replacing Mr Vavi.
>
> His union is associated with the pro-Zuma camp.
>
> Mr Seshoka said yesterday that the NUM was pleased with the current
> Cosatu leadership.
>
> "As far as the NUM is concerned, there is no succession debate at
> Cosatu. You support the leadership collective as it stands. Any
> assessment of this leadership will be done at congress next year. We
> have never consulted with our members about leadership at Cosatu."
> *
> *
> *
> From: http://www.businessday.co.za/Articles/Content.aspx?id=161215*
>
>
> *
> *
>
> --
> You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
> Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to
> this message.
> You can visit the group WEB SITE at
> http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery
> options, pages, files and membership.
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] .
> You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to
> put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to
> this address (repeat): [email protected] .
>
> --
> You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
> Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to
> this message.
> You can visit the group WEB SITE at
> http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery
> options, pages, files and membership.
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] .
> You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to
> put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to
> this address (repeat): [email protected] .
>

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

Reply via email to