Well said leader Sent from my iPhone
On 16 Dec 2011, at 12:52 PM, "Klaas Nono Mabunda" <[email protected]> wrote: > Cde. Alex, indeed you are correct that the Media Statement doesn't open for > more Media accreditation, because we understand clearly as an organisation > that congress is for members or delegates representing branches with a > membership status that's in good standing. > > If Alex want to convene a conference of journalists, do it at your own > accord, we cannot have a congress where a media company is represented by > over two respondents in one conference of the ANC, you can't caution me to > read whilst you are blind yourself or posses an inability to differentiate > between nine and six, or unless you have deployed your ignorance stunt. > > The statement apologises and promise to redress the shortfalls, but > furthermore clearly articulate that it will only allocate a room to correct > errors to those that initially applied for accreditation, not fools in full > speed that will want to start applying for accreditation. > > I equally cannot submit my classification of a leader to be an Entryist > merely because his approach to dealing with issues is sensed that the view to > masquerade mediocre of purging. > > Comrades become involved politically with an intention to host many > understanding on matters of significance not through and over an > impressionist bombshell, that in the process of political growth the sight on > issues brightens opposed to dim, on its own it is not a licence for name > calling and subject an MEC who is responsible for Finances to being a > Capitalist or a cocoon that always shaved its true outer. > > Perhaps a debate should be invoked that shall focus on who should represent > the ANC in government and what shall the person be called after having had > attained that position of responsibility, a petty-bourgeois ultra-leftist > perhaps, then where does Blade fit in the category of name calling as some > are given degrees of names. > > Masondo inherited the problems and as cadre devoted to the struggle for the > emancipation of all our people from all forms of neo-liberal agenda not "a > person who enters a political organisation in bad faith, under false > pretences, with the aim of climbing high in its ranks, and then exploiting > that position." > > How can inheriting a department with such intricate challenges be as a result > on parasitic aftermath, yours is playing with thesis in a strong view to > undermine the obviousness, let alone your tendencies of complete arrogance > and abundance of real material issues. > > Perhaps we should be told what communism is and also that why is the Red > Tshirt used to distabilize provinces in the Name of the Hegemony for the > dictatorship of the proletariat. > > VC, what in particular do you have against Masondo? > > "Eager for expropriation proves determination for rightful ownership, > especially where compensation is unlisted" > From: <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:38:38 +0000 > To: <[email protected]> > ReplyTo: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] David Masondo on the Limpopo administration > > Klaas must read the media statement he refers to. It makes it clear that it > does not seek to reopen the accreditation process, by the way that resulted > to exclusions. I less care about this any way, but reading will help Klaas. > > Klaas must read. It is DHM who accuses the ANC Cabinet of factionalism. I > REPEAT, to the contrary it is DHM who wrote a document, referred to in my > last email, advocating what he called decriminalisation of factions and > allowing the formalising of factions. This document was (and still is) the > product of factionalism itself. It was (and still is) factional. I REPEAT, > from this evidence, that the worst remnants of factionalism have a tendency > to pose themselves as "non-factional", the contradictions of DHM are there to > be seen. But if Klaas wears the same spectacles he will look at this > factionally by ignoring undisputed material evidence. I REPEAT with addition. > DHM would like to blind us that is appointment, NB, not election, into > provincial legislature, MEC and spokesperson position are non-factional. Only > being childish, and not concerned by anything at all, you can be convinced. > Where does DHM stand in the provincial conference. I doubt he's not with > those who conferred him appointments. This brings us to another related > point, patronage and servicing of patronage. That's where he could be. > > If DHM is being transparent, why not all along but after Section 100 (1)(a)? > Only after death when we lost the right of reply can we be told that which > Klass seeks to advocate. But our no reply the will not mean consent. It will > only mean we don't hear, we are dead. > > > > Sent by AlexM > From: Dominic Tweedie <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:55:21 +0200 > To: <[email protected]> > ReplyTo: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] David Masondo on the Limpopo administration > > > I'm not saying that DHM's politics are shifting, Cde Klaas. > > I strongly suspect that his politics have never shifted, and that he has > always been a Harveyist by nature, or in other words a PBUL - a > petty-bourgeois ultra-leftist. > > I think that while posing as an SACP cadre, DHM was really an entryist all > along. That's, let me repeat, ENTRYIST. It means a person who enters a > political organisation in bad faith, under false pretenses, with the aim of > climbing high in its ranks, and then exploiting that position. > > I did not spell it out in my previous e-mails, but since you are keen to > press on down your disastrous road, here it is. > > Let me repeat: David (DHM) Masondo was a hidden sectarian petty-bourgeois > ultra-leftist climber from the beginning of his political career which took > him to the position of National Chairperson of the YCLSA and membership of > the SACP Central Commmittee, after which he collected his javelin in Limpopo > Province as MEC for Finance. > > His latest hat is of spokesperson for the ANC in Limpopo, in which capacity > he is busy trying to factionalise the media. > > I will predict that the very media victims will go light on David Masondo, > and will instead blame "The ANC" or even the President of the Republic for > what David "Harvey" Masondo has done all by himself. > > This is because the bourgeois media recognise DHM as one of their > petty-bourgeois own. I predict that they will preserve him even when he > appears to be trying to hurt them. > > > VC > > > > > > On 16 December 2011 09:59, Klaas Nono Mabunda <[email protected]> > wrote: > If "remnants of factionalism call themselves non-factional, pose as > non-factional," > Then you too Alex & VC are factionalist that seeks to sit on a chair of > non-factional appearance, the article by Masondo actually put in transparency > and related aspects that the Limpopo Provincial Administration 's Financial > Problems are existing and bail outs and amicable resolution of the encounter > are called upon, yet you allow hatred myopic reactions to rub all the visible > issues Masondo raises and timely raise petty capitalisation of sentences and > unreadable paragraphs, then drag the Media accreditation squabble in the > whole thing, regardless that the ANC Limpopo has issued a Media Statement > that apologised on all those affected by the circumstances and promised > redress on the matter, you both speak like Masondo is the PEC, let alone > pretending to forget that Communications is the Subcommittee within the PEC > thus it acts on instructions and guidance of the PEC. > > You always find a way of turning tables against the floor and endure pleasure > in enjoying to claim misinterpretation of a document submitted mainly by > those against President Jacob Zuma 's tactic of leading, yet you claim > non-factionalism from your part, label comrades and force linkage with > Pseudoist like Trosky, then drag Lenin in the scene of your differences just > to better present your insinuate characteristics. > > The financial problems in Free State and North West are equivalent if not > worse than Limpopo, but an enforcement of Section 100[a] is enforced to > Gauteng and Free State, [b] to Limpopo, [b] being the most drastic subsection > under Section 100, whilst at the same space there are contingency measures > put in place to address the fiscal shortfalls of the Provincial Government. > > North West is literally undergoing shambling leadership and management crisis > which stands at threatening both Organisational and State Security, due to > mounting in fightings on and about, however, scenarios of raising descent to > President Zuma and Mantashe 's leadership aren't rife there hence no > enforcement tightened. > > Including the Eastern Cape Department of Education, where have you honestly > seen the enforcement or imposing of Section 100 being fruitful to both the > state and the masses the state is expected to shelter, it is not a solution > at all. > > Why is the Bank Overdraft at Limpopo an issue or subject for intervention now > of late after that Provincial Government undergone the same challenges dating > back from the years as mentioned by Cde. David Masondo, why wasn't the need > to probe Supply Chain Processes there start at around before and after the > financial year 2003\2004 when Low Cost Houses where half built but fully paid > or why isn't the Department of Sports, Art and Culture there not listed to be > taken care of by National Ministers after the Department has hosted in > succession the Mapungubwe Festival, organised with over R3.4 Million and only > manage to make R80 000, which the Department has lost over R2.8 Million. > Why wasn't it effected when the Department of Agriculture had problems with > accountability on State owned Farms. > > The Provincial Government indeed as Cde. Masondo has raised needs help not > technical antagonism to see to it the masses of our people are not destitute > and that the Economic or Revenue collection processes are not intercepted. > > VC as always you allowed your inability to draw a line between Factionalism > and pointing out of facts, to deliver your tongue to recklessness. > > Why dismiss a writing dogmatically in place of acknowledging the reality it > possesses. > > Perhaps your Mental Colonialism of Extra-Ordinary Special Type (colonialism > of EOSP) is real but applicable to you, As for terming him Harvey, you lost > memory and count of ideology and the fact that life is not stagnant so is the > seeing and understanding of issues at a particular juncture of a comrade 's > articulation and realities prompting the articulation, are you saying that it > is only communist if your believes aren't shifting, or is reliability perhaps > to you accredited when a person resists growing ideologically. > > Cde. Masondo and many of us 's observation are true that the Decision is > Congress Biased whose outcome matters a lot to us all the residents of > Limpopo. > > "Eager for expropriation proves determination for rightful ownership, > especially where compensation is unlisted" > From: <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:49:46 +0000 > To: <[email protected]> > ReplyTo: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] David Masondo on the Limpopo administration > > Dear VC, > > This are my preliminary observations, I will return with final copy of > response on every word, sentence and paragraph including illustrations. > > The CDE who has been championing the so-called decriminalisation of factions > and championing factionalism himself, involved in it, is complaining about > what he perceives to be factionalism. I agree with you on your point about > what CDE David ("Harvey", as you have identified him) Masondo (DHM) says > about factionalism recently, I mean in his latest article as pasted by Tu. In > the Disruption of Unity, Lenin shows, taking Trotsky head-on, how the worst > remnants of factionalism call themselves non-factional, pose as > non-factional, and now we can add, complain about what they perceive as > factional. Read DHM's 2010 paper on Nationalisation and Corruption (rejected > by YCLSA) to see for yourself and come into contact with written exhibit, and > the look at his alignment and realignments, part of which got him as MEC and > Spokesperson. For DHM this is purely non-factional. Jo! > > Secondly, according to DHM provinces are independent countries, only made > part of SA through Section 100 of its Constitution which amounts to > colonialism, perhaps of Extra-Ordinary Special Type (colonialism of EOSP). > This perception by DHM is obviously senseless, worst kind of factionalism, in > fact separatism of un-thought disorder. > > I'm very much interested since we went to elections two years ago, in 2009, > how Limpopo spent public money. By projects being complete is it meant > falling bridges, incomplete RDP houses that have been paid for in full > already? It only makes sense that the value of money for projects and prices > that have been paid be investigated thoroughly regardless of provincial > conference taking place or not taking place. Hiding behind provincial > conference, whose outcome matter less or not at all to many, is really taking > people for a ride. It also hides another dominant view which DHM is part but > does not talk about, i.e. a view to use the fact that there is provincial > conference and national conference taking place now or later and then using > them as shields and reasons to prevent real or alleged corruption from being > dealt with. > > Preliminary end. > > > Sent by AlexM > From: Dominic Tweedie <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:45:22 +0200 > To: <[email protected]> > ReplyTo: [email protected] > Cc: Group Communist University<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] David Masondo on the Limpopo administration > > > One thing I always try to maintain is readability. This post of your is > unreadable because it has no paragraph breaks, Cde Thamsanqa. > > In this form it just gives the impression of a long scream of pain by the man > whose glorious career as Finance MEC of Limpopo has been cut very short. > > At a personal level I am sorry for David Masondo, who has always been polite > and pleasant in his manner towards me. > > The fact that he managed to keep his politics (the politics of David Harvey) > hidden from view for so many years while he climbed the ladder, is another > matter altogether. > > I think that Cde Masondo has a problem to distinguish between the > constitutional workings of the mass movement, and factional activity. > > In his simple mind, factionalism is what his opponents do. The three fingers > pointing back at himself, he does not notice. > > We will just have to wait and see what the outcome of the Limpopo congress > is, if we can see it. > > It may be difficult to see, because now the same David Harvey Masondo has > popped up in the guise of ANC spokesperson, and he has been busy excluding > any journalists he may not like from the Limpopo Provincial Congress - > something that I cannot recall happening at any ANC, COSATU or SACP > Congresses at any level, before. > > > VC > > > > > > On 16 December 2011 07:02, Thamsanqa Tu <[email protected]> wrote: > Vice Chancellor Tweedie, > > I came across this piece of writing on David Masondo's facebook page, > -- > You are subscribed. This footer can help you. > Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to > this message. > You can visit the group WEB SITE at > http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery > options, pages, files and membership. > To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . > You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put > anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this > address (repeat): [email protected] . > -- > You are subscribed. This footer can help you. > Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to > this message. > You can visit the group WEB SITE at > http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery > options, pages, files and membership. > To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . > You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put > anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this > address (repeat): [email protected] . > -- > You are subscribed. This footer can help you. > Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to > this message. > You can visit the group WEB SITE at > http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery > options, pages, files and membership. > To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . > You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put > anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this > address (repeat): [email protected] . -- You are subscribed. This footer can help you. Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this message. You can visit the group WEB SITE at http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, pages, files and membership. To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [email protected] .
