Comrades 

I must really say i am overwhelmed by the analysis raised by comrade Lazola. 
Comrades we should really try our level best to respond to such views with 
honesty and the level of political maturity that the analysis itself seeks to 
answer. I am really happy with the way you raised the issues Lazola shows 
political maturity my chief and i hope comrades will do justice when responding 
and not sink to empty politics.


________________________________
 From: Lazola Ndamase <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] Does Malema belong to the ANC and the Congress 
Movement?
 

Gugu

I am quite sure, that there is a necessity to separate Pan-African as an 
English word and Pan-Africanism as an ideological standpoint. Another matter 
that needs separation is Pan-Africanism globally and Pan-Africanism in South 
Africa. You would understand that Pan-Africanism in South Africa as is found in 
the PAC and other like-minded organizations has a culture that includes 
language. The word "African child" is part of that language of the PAC. I am 
not saying it should not be used as an English word, but we generally do not 
use it in the MDM. 

Sure

Lazola 


On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:39 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

I hope we can debate the context in which Lazola is raising this because its 
worrying 
>Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>________________________________
>
>From:  [email protected] 
>Sender:  [email protected] 
>Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:21:47 +0000
>To: <[email protected]>
>ReplyTo:  [email protected] 
>Subject: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] Does Malema belong to the ANC and the Congress 
>Movement?
>
>Comrade Lazola I would like to point out that Julius Malema is no more a 
>member of the ANC and therefore referring to him as comrade is misleading.
>Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>________________________________
>
>From:  Lazola Ndamase <[email protected]> 
>Sender:  [email protected] 
>Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:01:51 +0200
>To: <[email protected]>; 
>yclsa-eom-forum<[email protected]>
>ReplyTo:  [email protected] 
>Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Does Malema belong to the ANC and the Congress 
>Movement?
>
>Does Malema belong to the ANC?
>
>The ANC is not ideologically pure. It would be dishonestto suggest so. Any way 
>as a multi-class organization it is bound never 
to be. Any national liberation movement worth its salt has a 
responsibility to attract the broadest sections of the oppressed in 
order to succeed in its struggle. In order to ensure unity within its 
ranks whilst maintaining its broad appeal, it has a responsibility to 
set out an all inclusive, less stringent ideological perspective whilst 
at the same time allowing enough space for various ideological 
standpoints to contest for hegemony within.
>
>However, although 
tolerant to divergent ideological standpoints within its ranks it has a 
responsibility to draw the line, or set broad parameters about its 
ideological standing. That’s exactly what the ANC did in relation to 
African chauvinism, or what in a more sophisticated sense is termed 
Pan-Africanism. This does not mean our movement believes Pan-Africanists
 are counter-revolutionary, it just believes that they are not as 
progressive as it would prefer.
>
>Contrary to the ANC, comrade 
Malema is not a progressive nationalist, something to which the ANC has 
evolved to base its Africanism; in contrast he is a Pan-Africanist. The 
primacy of his ideas is Pan-Africanist rather than Progressive 
Nationalist. His ideas resonate well with those of other Pan-Africanist 
youth organizations in the continent which have openly declared support 
for him such as Zanu-PF and the liberation movement of Tanzania Chama 
cha Mapinduzi. This is in contrast to the silent treatment he has 
received from our traditional allies such as Frelimo of Mozambique and 
the MPLA of Angola.
>
>In him, Pan-Africanists in the continent 
saw themselves. His Pan-Africanism is also the reason why the term 
“African Child” has found new popularity since he became President of 
the ANCYL. Before him, by the way, this term did not belong to the 
vocabulary of the Congress Movement but to that of the Pan-Africanists 
such as the PAC, AZAPO and other similar movements.
>
>Another 
term barely used in the movement popularized by Malema is the word 
“settler”, a word Julius brought us from the Pan-Africanist dictionary. 
The Congress Movement barely used this term, even in our songs, or 
chants. The closest an ANC member got to this would be through the use 
of the word Boer. Note, even the most controversial chant done in the 
movement “kill the Boer: the farmer”, still does not contain the word 
“settler”. “One settler, one bullet” was not a slogan of the ANC but 
that of the PAC, and our cadres were not cultured to speak in this way, 
hence we could not chant in this way.
>
>The fact that he is 
Pan-Africanist, does not suggest that comrade Malema’s ideas are not 
left leaning, or less radical, in actual fact, he is a bloody radical 
one. His Pan-Africanism, is what I believe drives his radicalism, 
despite the fact that his location in class society should have driven 
him otherwise. It is not in spite of his Pan-Africanism but because of 
it that he is so radical. Although stinking rich, he being an “African 
Child” cannot bear to see the impoverishment of another “African Child” 
particularly while he, the rich one, is surrounded by “white settlers” 
in rich society. This is completely painful for the “African child”. The
 fact that comrade Malema, was born from an African working class family
 strengthens this point of view, particularly his idea  that the enemy 
is not the capitalist per se, which he himself is, but the “white 
capitalist”. 
>
>His infatuation with “white" monopoly capital 
does not stem only from the ANC’s characterization of monopoly capital 
as a threat to development but arises from his own realization that it 
is the face of white opulence. The fact that monopoly capital to him, 
has a color is one other interesting fact. Of course, I am not denying 
that Monopoly capital is largely white, but the fact that in Malema’s 
eyes it seems not all Monopoly Capital is an enemy of the revolution but
 only assumes that role because its white. Even on the question of 
conspicuous consumption. Comrade Malema often retorts whether it should 
only be white youth that should dress in a particular way or not? He 
makes this point at every turn: even lamenting that rich “white” boys 
drive expensive cars in Sandton and nobody complains. 
>
>By the 
way, Pan-Africanism is not just radical but also uncompromising. Comrade
 Malema is cut from the same cloth. My view though is that, its South 
African version is unscientific. It will never be able to resolve the 
race question in South Africa but would exacerbate it. Of course, when 
the struggle for liberation is still in its infancy, Pan-Africanism or 
Black Consciousness is necessary to uplift the self-worth of the 
oppressed and rouse them to stand up against their oppression. But it 
usually can go no further.
>
>Comrade Julius Malema should not 
have joined the ANC in the first place. He does not belong there and he 
does not share its ideas. Of course, for numerical purposes we must be 
thankful that he chose to join the ANC rather than the PAC or AZAPO. He 
must be more thankful that his Pan-Africanist tendencies were not 
discovered early on before he could rise up the organizational ladder. 
For this, he must thank our now pathetic recruitment system which holds 
that anyone with a membership form and fee is almost a member.
>
>Surely, I am not suggesting that our movement should not have looked to 
the Africanists to recruit. Anyway, the brightest in the liberation 
movement are often located in these organizations, but it is an 
indictment on our movement that it has not been able to win comrade 
Julius Malema over to its viewpoint since it recruited him at the age of
 9 as he would have us believe. When an organization arrives at this 
realization it has no choice but to let go of its recruitee, but this 
has to be a political function rather than a Disciplinary one. 
-- 
>You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
>Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
>message.
>You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
>pages, files and membership.
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . 
>You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
>anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
>address (repeat): [email protected] .
>
>
-- 
>You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
>Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
>message.
>You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
>pages, files and membership.
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . 
>You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
>anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
>address (repeat): [email protected] .
>
-- 
>You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
>Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
>message.
>You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
>pages, files and membership.
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . 
>You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
>anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
>address (repeat): [email protected] .
>

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

Reply via email to