Thank you Gugu. 

Well written piece indeed. You say 'Where do the likes of Ken Sinclair and 
Jessica Leandra derive their resentment and condescending attitude for Black 
South Africans?' Well, while yours is a good and honest question, you obfuscate 
it by saying, 'The likes of  Tshidi, Ken and Jessica are a new generation of 
racists...' You have compromised your grasp of what racism is by including 
Tshidi in the list. A racial slur is not equivalent to being racist. 

Let me explain: Ken and Jessica, although they may be school colleagues of 
black kids, their lifestyle is fundamentally superior and comfortable. What do 
I mean? They live in bigger and secured (from black encroachment) homes, they 
have decent infrastructure; they know blacks as garden boys, house maids and 
trolley pushers at the supermarket; they don't know where the Blacks live until 
they see the tin houses and squatters through the window of their parents' big 
cars which always drive speedily further off the townships. Jessica's and Ken's 
parents are executives and managers of educated Blacks despite the superior or 
equal education on the part of Blacks. (Theirs earn 8 times more than Tshidi's 
re: Lucy Holborn's labour/salary surveys 2010/2011.) 
When they've been to their grandpa's farm, it is Tshidi's relatives who slog 
away and tolerate the shouts and insults from grandpa and his son...a son who 
soon enrols at UFS and lodges at Reitz residence! He has everything. And soon, 
whether govt will employ him or not, he is the heir of grandpa's farm - thanks 
to section 25 of the constitution - and he will carry on peddling the racist 
order. 

I could go on... Suffice it to say to you how dare you call Tshidi racist? 
Tshidi does not have the power (economic/legal/political/cultural) to subjugate 
Jessica or any white person for that matter, whether or not her parents are 
well off.
I enjoyed your piece. 

FUSI
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 09:13:05 
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] Fwd: The unilateral road towards nation
 building- Danger signs ahead

Very powerful insight Cde Gugu!

We still truly have a long road to travel. I can't say as a nation because we 
are not a nation, but just a bunch of 50million people who just tolerate each 
other in public but abuse one another behind closed doors (master-servant) or, 
of late, in social networks. 

It all goes down to the issues of entitlement by whites and inferiority by 
Africans. If SA is still refered as ZA, it ain't gonna change. If Africans are 
still refered to as "black", it ain't gonna change. If more than 80% of roads 
and towns names still reflect apartheid, nothing is going to change. If we are 
still members of Commonwealth, it ain't gonna change. If racism is not a 
criminal issue but an equality/human rights issue, nothing will change. If 
there are still Afrikaans-only schools, your guess is as good as mine.

I still believe that CODESA and TRC were just charades. Blacks went to TRC as 
humiliated beggars, only to go there to humiliate themselves for what? For a 
little Bishop to receive nobel prize? I hope the upcoming policy conference of 
the ANC will bring real second transition for these humiliated beggars.

Nathi Mdletshe  
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!

-----Original Message-----
From: Gugu Ndima <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:10:27 
To: YCLSA-FORUM<[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Fwd: The unilateral road towards nation building-
 Danger signs ahead

*The unilateral road towards nation building- Danger signs ahead*

**

I was intrigued by a very innocent, captivating picture on the front page
of two major publications.  Two “born free” young South Africans which
represent diversity in SA were nicely captured. The picture alone tells
many tales; at first glance it’s perfect and annulled of sin or pretence.
It’s a picture of hope for nation building and for anyone seeing the
picture without reading the story, they could easily be led to deception,
thinking that we have perfectly managed diversity and finally have a non
racial society where black and white South Africans can now gather around a
camp fire and sing Kumbaya.  Wow South Africa has arrived, I say to myself
until I read the story behind the crocodile grins of the young two ladies



These two young models were in a racist spat on a social network recently.
They allegedly kissed and made up and a cynical Kodak moment, organised by
the affirmative action representative of DA was captured on the front page
of many newspapers. As expected of South Africans, we had a teary moment of
facade reconciliation and pretended that the evil step sister named
“Racism” is dead and gone-again.

****

One is not sure whether to describe ourselves as gullible or we have our
heads so deep in the sand that it’s unbearable to even think of confronting
racism in our society head on. Every time we hear rantings reported we
again get angry and are reminded of the good old beast.  This week, over
and above the model and young fellow from Cape Town story, FW De Klerk took
the overall standing ovation on CNN and asserted that deep down there are
deeply entrenched beliefs that whites still rein supreme. His words were
short of saying that the apartheid government actually did blacks a favour
and made them vote (in their bush homelands where they belong I guess).



 This then made me wonder where this insurrectionist behaviour, especially
on race stems from   with the “born free “generation? Where do the likes of
Ken Sinclair and Jessica Leandra derive their resentment and condescending
attitude for fellow Black South Africans? Not so long ago we were tackling
the Reitz Four case as a nation. The truth is that this is the exact
teachings disseminated at their homes over dinner, in churches in their
social gatherings when there is no black ear to listen but possibly the
domestic worker.



The FW De Klerk’s of this world can never see blacks as equal fellow human
species in their world.  So the generation after them and grandchildren can
only pass on this institutionalised thinking to their future descendants.
Supremacy runs in their veins, religion and way of life. For the mere fact
that Jessica was audacious enough to post such a criminal statement without
thinking, simply means that this word is right at the tip of her tongue,
used daily and has never been reprimanded for it until recently; hence she
was even shocked at the reaction of the public simply because in her
community, and immediate social network this is a way of life. This is how
they view blacks. The question is, what are their parents teaching them?



    In South Africa 18 years post democracy we have a place called Orania
which epitomises racial segregation and sustains separatism (within a
democratic country) in this day in age. These spontaneous slurs are a
deeper reflection of the rage and re-emergence of racial tensions.  We
can’t hide from it any longer; we can’t glossy coat it through TV adverts
and racially correct tip-toeing. We now have a younger generation
“supposedly “born-free” which has been severely contaminated and will not
be kept silent.  Tshidi Manana most probably not even politically active,
for that moment  made sense of some slogans which the late Comrade Peter
Mokaba made back then, because she actually had a taste of racial
intolerance and blatant attack on her being by a white counterpart. I doubt
she said this because she is racist, but she responded to the arrogant tone
and statement made by Jessica Leandra demeaning a black man publicly
showing no remorse. It’s highly simplistic to say that she was racist –hers
was no different from blacks in the 70’s responding to the draconian rule
of the apartheid regimen who belittled and undermined blacks.



 We can do all ‘sorts of reconciliation PR exercises to cover up isolated
slurs, but this does not address the under current beneath the calm
surface. If a Minister in Cabinet can call his black colleagues Bantu’s or
use that word as a reference in this day in age, what does he teach his
children?



  As a nation we haven’t achieved racial harmony, it has been mere
tolerance imposed to a large extent by the law. It has not been voluntary
and as a nation we have bought into fragile non racialism through Vanity
Fair “nation building” events such as the world cup (rugby and soccer). The
road has been a unilateral one where consistently its blacks that accept
apologies, racially motivated crimes reported- blacks are victims, black
workers are exploited in companies. Its consistently been the black hand
that must hold out the white flag to keep the nation building torch alive-
hence these slurs because not both parties are coming to the table
equally.



If it wasn’t for affirmative action, Black economic empowerment, employment
equity, and generally the constitution- many whites would have been happy
with keeping the apartheid status quo, even though some don’t expressly say
it.  Hence even most complains about government come from their pockets of
society and honestly speaking the democratic government is worse compared
to what previous government or regime in South Africa; the apartheid
government? This is the only government regime in SA that has initiated
inclusivity of all races, which has championed non-racialism despite
conceited efforts to undermine it.  Non-racialism will perpetually be a
vision if we fail to address societal factors which still assert racial
stereotypes such as “white supremacy”.  Blacks in their majority are still
poor and marginalised in the main stream of the economy.   Racial spatial
disintegration still exists due to historical social economic imbalances-
and one can still distinguish between a township and a “suburb”.



The judiciary unfortunately to a very large extent still plays an
instrumental (wittingly or unwittingly) in maintaining the apartheid status
quo.  Organisations such as the Afri-Forum have never been apologetic about
their views and what they stand for; which is largely to preserve
historical  memorabilia which has no place in the current dispensation .  .
They managed to single handily wipe off a significant piece of history- the
Dubulíbhunu song,   through courts.   They continue to use courts to
undermine transformation as their power base is still largely economical
and many economically powerful beings share their views in silent corners.
So since access to the justice system still largely depends on your
economic base, then it will still be accessed by a few to maintain and
preserve traces of our dark past.



The likes of Tshidi, Ken and Jessica are the new generation of racists –
they now have access to social networks and can take the fight to
uncontained places. One wonders how many other “born-frees” who have
inherited such abhorrence for fellow their SA citizens exist.  We should be
apprehensive rather than passive;  this should be a lesson for all South
Africans, that racism is a stark reality and our failure to deal with  it,
will only  create an unnecessary burden for future generations

****

*Gugu Ndima*

*A concerned patriot  *

** **
 ------------------------------
 *
Note:*
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If
you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. *Gauteng Provincial Legislature *and any of its subsidiaries
each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its
networks.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to
state them to be the views of any such entity.

*Thank You.
*
------------------------------
 ------------------------------

Scanned by *MailMarshal* - M86 Security's comprehensive email content
security solution. Download a free evaluation of MailMarshal at
www.m86security.com

**
------------------------------



-- 
Gugu Ndima
+27 76 783 1516

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

Reply via email to