Good article my friend, but after reading this article i am sure that
everyone will say i agree with Aphiwe but the challenges you highlight will
still persist in next congress. Therefore a question remain in concrete
terms what must be done to effect desired change.

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:23 PM, VC <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> [image: ANC Today]
>
>
> *Cohesion in times of factions, money and sins-of-incumbency*
> ** **
> ** **
> *Aphiwe Bewana, ANC Today, Johannesburg, 6 July 2012 *
> ** **
> *"Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are
> presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence
> cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely
> uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important
> to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore and even deny
> anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief."-* Frantz Fanon****
> ** **
> The fundamental question we have today is how do we programmatically
> address the challenges confronting the great majority of South Africans. In
> our attempts to comprehend the extent to which the ruling party is fit to
> govern; we also need to equally grasp the social condition in which the
> ruling party has been operating and evolving in. The ruling party has long
> reflected on this: "While it is correct to look at the traditions of the
> ANC from years of struggle, we should also acknowledge the new situation
> within which we operate as the leading organization in government … This
> has thrown up new tasks which are in many ways of a different nature" (ANC:
> Challenges of leadership in our phase 1997).****
> ** **
> One of the key challenges facing the ANC has been comprehensively managing
> the difficulties of moving from a liberation movement to a party of
> government (Friedman 2012). Moreover given the state of unreadiness in
> which we found as acknowledged by President Mandela at the opening of the
> 1994 Conference, where he admitted that "ours was not a planned entry into
> government. Except for the highest echelons… We were disorganized, and
> behaved in a manner that could have endangered the revolution".****
> ** **
> The participation and being in a leadership position had changed from a
> sacrifice which would translate in harassment, exile, jail time or even
> death into a reasonable avenue for many to climb the social ladder. But
> even more profound has been the 'death of a cadre' (people changing the ANC
> instead of being changed by the ANC). Given this radical shift in social
> conditions, I am of the view that the explanation of today's subversion of
> organizational culture and organization's internal ills is fundamentally
> more than just a function of a lack of political education and leadership.
> ****
> ** **
> My conviction is that the ANC needed to structurally and practically
> re-assess its mode of operation as a whole in adapting to new realities,
> particularly in maintaining vibrant internal unity and cohesion. My premise
> is the same as the evolutionary science theory advocated by Charles Darwin
> which states: "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor
> the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most
> adaptable to change." One can assume the role of a denialist when we talk
> about these core challenges or one can be frank with the hope that we can
> learn and attempt to reserve internal damage being done to the
> organization; I assume the latter.****
> ** **
> For the purpose of this article I have selected a few crucial internal
> problems that continue to haunt our beloved organization and movement.
> These problems are factions, money and sins-of-incumbency. Put simply, I am
> of a firm belief that most of our challenges within the party are
> manifestations of failing to conclusively deal with these problems. The ANC
> has long indentified these problems and made the clarion calls for
> organizational renewal, however little if any intervention has signaled to
> meaningfully addressing and reversing these problems.****
> ** **
> For obvious reasons the depth of manifestations of the problems become
> even more pronounced towards elective conferences. As such, rational
> thought hints at the fact that if little is done to rectify the structure
> of our mode of operation (rules) to at the very least manage these
> contractions, then we have a serious problem on our hands. We should not
> allow a situation where the ANC is in a state of perpetual disciplinary
> hearings.****
> ** **
> In attempting to fundamentally deal with the problems I have mentioned
> above, we need to conceptually characterise them concretely and identify
> conditions which produce or replicate them. In this regard, the 'sins of
> incumbency' can be seen as the temptations of wealth, 'money' as influence
> of money in supporting a person or policy view, and 'factions' which can be
> viewed as parties within a party. What is of importance to me is the nature
> and interplay between these unfortunate factors.****
> ** **
> The general accepted notion is that these challenges exist as
> manifestation of an important contest for the soul of the ANC. Moreover,
> Prof. Steven Friedman importantly points out that the core issue is the
> clash between an antidemocratic form of politics and its opponents. The
> good professor further elaborates that a key tactic of this group is the
> use of strident nationalist rhetoric to justify a patronage politics that
> hopes to use money to gain position and position to gain more money. And
> those who practice these politics are hostile to the ANC's left.****
> ** **
> Whilst this analysis may seem sound, it falls short of actually dissecting
> the dynamic nature of these 'factions'. Experience in Polokwane showed us
> that it is always likely some elements which constitute one faction to sway
> to the other side when it is convenient to do so. This therefore leads to
> some conclusion that our factions are not rigid and static but can be
> heavily influenced by the balance of forces of the day.****
> ** **
> This issue should not only be limited to the fact that these factions do
> not differ on ideological or policy direction per se but what influences
> their actions. This ought to be one of the most troublesome tenets of how
> our factions operate. The issue is that the very same faction that opposes
> antidemocratic practices and use of money in our politics is not inherently
> immune from committing the same errors it opposes if that meant winning
> conference.****
> ** **
> One of the fundamental concepts which theoretically bind the two problems
> is determining what is of personal interest versus organizational interest
> and how does the organization thus set up rules that enforces a clear mode
> of operations. Within the ANC there are now two strands of thought in this
> regard with its own implications. One view is advocating for the
> organization striving for some convergence between personal and collective
> interests whereas another view warrants an individual person's interests
> should be superseded by those of the organization.****
> ** **
> If we also agree that to larger extent factions are produced or replicated
> by personal interests over-shadowing those of the organization, then it
> stands to reason that in line with its traditional roots the ANC ought to
> jealously defend the latter perspective and formulate rules to enforce it.
> The change needed should be based on structural rules rather than on
> rallying or only relying on leadership to one day rise above the 'sins of
> incumbency', 'influence of money' and 'factions' in which they are
> inherently entangled to. These problems manifest themselves in a lot of
> dimensions which in essence derail the organization from programmatically
> addressing the challenges confronting the great majority of South Africans.
> ****
> ** **
> I do believe that one of the useful areas in which the ANC can attempt to
> formulate a new set of rules would be how it manages leadership
> transitions, managing manifestations of problems I have mentioned above.
> What is true is that the current system {mode of operation} is not coping
> with the new realities within which the ANC finds itself. The ANC needs to
> re-assess how it elects its leadership. Currently after five years a small
> fraction of the ANC membership from branches gather to a national congress
> to resolve on the policy path and elect leadership.****
> ** **
> Whilst this is necessary and essential in ANC life, I do believe in harsh
> factional times it will forever reduce the capacity of the organization to
> robustly engage and resolve on policy to address the challenges confronting
> the great majority of South Africans. Energies will be spent on leadership
> issues, of which I am not arguing are mutually exclusive in any way.****
> ** **
> I do believe the main role of congress is to agree on a policy and how it
> will be effectively implemented. The ANC ought to make that the core
> business of congress and elections be done at branch level, wherein all the
> members will vote and have a direct say in who leads it. The argument is
> simple, the current system that we have was appropriate for the struggle
> times when the ANC was harassed and exiled and banned. It was appropriate
> to convene 'consultative conferences' using proportional representation to
> determine delegations and had to discuss and elect leadership in one event.
> But it now poses a serious challenge to cohesion in the new social
> conditions (i.e. vastness of ANC, diverse and factional interests in ANC,
> and winning conference at all cost etc.)****
> ** **
> We are observing that it is forever a difficulty to foster a healthy and
> comradely competition for positions, but the system is evolving into a
> brutal contest which undermines what the organization stands for. So if we
> are frank and honest with each other, we would agree that combining
> 'discussion' and 'election' tasks for a fraction of delegates (sometimes
> even disputed) in one congress event is problematic. The contestation,
> fights and disputes of marginalization and sidelining with regards to
> branch audits and delegation audits, especially towards a conference has
> become a norm in our organization.****
> ** **
> These tendencies are chopping away the confidence our people have on the
> ruling party and more. The change in election task to include all its
> subscribed members has the advantages of deepening democracy within the
> organization and the nation and subsequently fostering participation of all
> members in the functioning of the organization. In that way the
> manifestations that get heightened towards the conference can be managed.*
> ***
> ** **
> In simple ANC must radically transform its posture to reflect the
> organization than individuals, i.e. songs, slogans must place an emphasis
> on collective not individuals as in times of factions our rich culture and
> practice will be subverted for narrow factional gains and threatened our
> cohesion.****
> ** **
> *"It is imperative to contest all factions for complete victory, so the
> army is not garrisoned and the profit can be total. This is the law of
> strategic siege."* - Sun Tzu****
> ** **
>
>    - *Aphiwe Bewana* is an ANC member in Port Elizabeth Ward 2
>
> ** **
> *From: http://www.anc.org.za/docs/anctoday/2012/at26.htm#art2*
> * *
> * *
>   *
>
> *
>
> --
> You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
> Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to
> this message.
> You can visit the group WEB SITE at
> http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery
> options, pages, files and membership.
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected]. 
> You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to
> put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail
> to this address (repeat): [email protected] .
>

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

<<ANCtodayNew.gif>>

Reply via email to