ANCtodayNew.gif

 

 

South Africans still speaking past each other

 

 

Cyril Ramaphosa, ANC Today, Johannesburg, 15 November 2013

 

Viewpoint by Cyril RamaphosaTwenty years after the advent of democracy,
South Africans still find themselves speaking past each other. Last weekend,
during a voter registration drive in Limpopo, I was explaining to a Seshego
resident why it was important for her to vote in next year's elections.
Among other things, I said it was important that South Africa does not go
backwards.

 

Speaking in Sepedi, I said we don't want to go back to a time where we are
under the control of 'the boers'. This comment has caused consternation in
some quarters, with claims that I had made derogatory statements about
Afrikaners in particular and whites in general. I did not, and I would not.
The comments were never intended to refer to any section of our population,
and it is unfortunate that they have been interpreted in that way.

 

It is not surprising that some political parties have seized on this issue
in an attempt to gain mileage ahead of the elections. But this issue goes
far deeper than party politics. It illustrates that South Africans from
different backgrounds and with different histories still find it hard to
understand each other.

 

Among most black South Africans, 'the boers' is a term commonly understood
to refer to the former apartheid oppressors. In this context, it does not
refer to Afrikaners, or farmers, or whites. For most black South Africans,
and for others who are familiar with the traditions of the liberation
struggle, this distinction is clearly understood.

 

But what is clear from the reaction my comments have generated, is that this
distinction is not understood by all South Africans. The self-proclaimed
representatives of white South Africa - principally the Freedom Front Plus
and the Democratic Alliance - have said the use of this word is racist. They
have accused me of trying to polarise South Africans.

 

They are wrong on both counts. The problem they have is that they have
failed - perhaps even refused - to understand the language that black South
Africans use to describe their history. They have decided for themselves
what 'the boers' means in this context, ignoring what the people who use
this term actually mean by it.

 

It is unfortunate that this miscomprehension is not limited to political
parties, who find it useful in the pursuit of their narrow agendas. Many
whites and many Afrikaners similarly find it difficult to see the
distinction between reference to those who perpetrated the crime of
apartheid and whites as a group. We have always said that the liberation
struggle was fought against white supremacy, not against whites.

 

When the Freedom Charter was adopted in Kliptown in 1955, it proclaimed that
South Africa belonged to all who live in it, black and white. That principle
remains at the heart of the policies, programmes and pronouncements of the
African National Congress.

 

That is why, when I spoke in Seshego, I said that South Africa could not
afford to go backwards. Just as we cannot squander the progress we have made
over the last 20 years, we need to be wary of those that seek to erode the
very achievement of democracy. We need to build a better South Africa in
which all South Africans can prosper.

 

This was the same message that I delivered on the same weekend to a
predominantly Afrikaans audience that had gathered for the 'Saamstaan vir 'n
beter Suid Afrika' music and prayer meeting in Kempton Park. I said that for
South Africa to overcome the challenges it faces, people need to work
together. We each need to take responsibility for improving our society.
Wherever we come from, whatever our political views, we are all South
Africans, and we all seek a better South Africa.

 

This event provided clear proof for anyone who may have doubted it that
Afrikaners are concerned about the challenges facing the country, and are
determined to be part of efforts to overcome them.

 

There is no contradiction between my support of the event in Kempton Park
and the comments I made in Seshego. In both instances, I delivered the same
message: South Africans need to work together to build a better country.

 

There are few who would disagree with this message. So why the outcry from
some quarters? Perhaps it is because  we, from the side of the liberation
movement, have not worked hard enough to explain the words we use and what
we mean by them. Perhaps it is because those who take offence at these words
have not made an effort to understand what they mean to those who use them.
I suspect it is a combination of the two.

 

If we are to create a new, united nation, South Africans need to stop
speaking past each other. They need to start speaking to each other.

 

 

.        Cyril Ramaphosa is the Deputy President of the ANC

 

 

From: http://www.anc.org.za/docs/anctoday/2013/at25.html#art1

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to