"There is nothing worth retaining from financialisation..."
And finally - anticlimax. 
Not the dictatorship of the proletariat, not the common ruin of the
contending classes, but guess what: more "policies".
  _____  


 


 



 

Financialisation and State Capture

 

(Originally called "What can we say about the crisis of 2007/2009?")

 

"Financialisation is an epochal transformation of capitalism"

 

 

Part VI

 

Financialisation Must Be Reversed!

 

Costas Lapavitsas, Theory and Struggle, Marx Memorial Library, 2014

 

 

Part VI

 

Financialisation has to be reversed

 

Financialisation is a historical transformation that has deep roots and
requires a systemic and deep confrontation to be dealt with. Let's think
about it for a minute. Socialists typically say capitalism develops the
forces of production, revolutionises material and social life, but it does
so in a problematic, exploitative, oppressive and crisis-ridden way.
Therefore, what we need to do is retain what is progressive, retain the
technical and other advances and do away with the social relations of
capitalism that create the social problems, the conflicts and so on.

 

Can we think of financialisation in this way? The answer is no.
Financialisation doesn't represent a significant social benefit to humanity.
What exactly is the gain from the expansion and the explosive growth of
finance, from financial markets being able to set financial prices across
the globe in a fraction of a second?  So what?  Let's take a few seconds
more. Let's take hours. Let's take days. Why should we be mobilising
incredible resources, highly trained physics graduates to deal with
computers that deploy advanced programmes to allow people to trade
derivatives across the globe constantly? Why? Let's never do it.

 

The net benefit to humanity from financialisation, seen generally, appears
to be negligible. The first thing that has to be said about
financialisation, then, is that it has to be reversed. The growth of finance
has to be reversed. Humanity gains very little from this incredible
explosion of financial capabilities, institutions, mechanisms and markets.
Reversal of financialisation is the order of the day, not take
financialisation as given and trying to do something with it. There's
nothing, or very little that we can do with it. It's in this context that we
should be thinking of policies to confront financialisation, and then the
meaning will become clear.

 

How, then, do we reverse a historical transformation that is so deeply
rooted? It isn't simply a matter of regulation, nor simply a matter of
policy. First, we have to start with the industrial and commercial
enterprises and stop their involvement in finance in the first place. Stop
them from financialising. How to do that? Well, one way is to adopt a
strategy of public investment, together with policies that limit the
financial activities of enterprises and changes, including the way in which
they organise their internal affairs. That's where we have to start, if we
are going to confront financialisation in a structural way.

 

Then what? Well, then we need to do something about banks. Private banks
operate in the way which I have explained and create crises; they have
basically failed and have relied on the state to rescue them. So how do you
we deal with them?  We need public ownership and public control over banks.
To me it is obvious. Not only nationalisation, because nationalisation by
itself doesn't mean anything very much. The capitalist state can nationalise
banks; RBS is nationalised after a fashion. We need public ownership and
public control over banks. We need a new spirit of public service and new
mechanisms to run these institutions in a public way detaching them from
what they have doing the last few decades.

 

And what about households?  There I think that things become even more
complex. If we are going to remove financialisation from the sphere of
households, then we need to reintroduce public provision in housing, in
health, in education. For that we need to insist that public are better than
private methods. And under no circumstances should private finance be
mediating provision to households, because private finance is not equipped
to do so. When it is put in those terms, it is clear that confronting
financialisation required innovative, communal and associational policies of
household provision to come into play.

 

These policies to confront and reverse financialisation would obviously
reject austerity and wage restraint, which is the way in which the state has
dealt with the current crisis. And they would be accompanied by measures of
profound income and wealth redistribution. It is clear, then, that reversing
financialisation requires steps that are inherently anti-capitalist and open
up fresh avenues towards socialism. This is the kind of socialism that we
need for the 21st century, the kind of socialism that meets the needs of the
current era, and begins to speak to people in the here and now about what
the world ought to be like. I think that this is the task we have in front
of us and the sooner we begin to develop these ideas, the better for all of
us.

 

 

 

From:
http://www.marxlibrary.org.uk/theory-struggle/item/175-what-can-we-say-about
-the-crisis-of-2007-2009

 

To read a facsimile of the original, on line, complete with all the graphs,
go to:

 

https://issuu.com/marxmemoriallibrary/docs/14junefinal_1_/2?e=16494710/14316
995

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to