SACP with Red.png

 

South African Communist Party, 3 April 2016

 

 

SACP Political Bureau Statement

 

 

A scheduled SACP Political Bureau meeting was convened in Johannesburg on
Friday 1 April. Meeting on the day after the important Constitutional Court
unanimous judgement on the Nkandla matter, the Politburo naturally devoted
most attention to the implications of the judgement and the collective
responsibilities that ensue from it. The judgement and yesterday's public
apology to the country by President Zuma were important moments in the
re-affirmation and consolidation of constitutionality and the rule of law in
our still relatively young democracy.

 

The SACP knows all too well from the history of many other post-colonial and
post-independence third world societies that, where a democratic
constitution and the rule of law are eroded by parasitic and comprador
elements, often in the fictitious name of fighting "imperialism", then it is
the workers and poor, along with left-wing political formations that quickly
become the key victims. The brutal suppression of mass communist parties at
the hands of parasitic nationalist strata from within independence movements
in Sudan, Iraq, Egypt, Indonesia and elsewhere in the second half of the
20th century should never be forgotten.

 

Thursday's Concourt judgement and the evident popular acclamation it
received from the widest array of South Africans should be a clear warning
signal to the ANC, to our ANC-led alliance, and to the ANC-led government.
Decisive action is now imperative, otherwise the continuing loss of moral
authority, political paralysis and fragmentation of our movement will
continue. For these reasons, the SACP will seek an urgent meeting with the
officials of the ANC and, of course, a commitment to ongoing engagement.

 

President Zuma's apology and his undertaking to implement to the full the
remedial actions proposed by the Public Protector, and now upheld as
enforceable by the Concourt, are important beginnings. 

 

The ANC parliamentary caucus (which includes, of course, SACP members who
serve as ANC MPs), also needs to conduct serious and collective
soul-searching. The Concourt judgement correctly found that Parliament had
failed to exercise its constitutional responsibility in holding the
executive to account in the Nkandla matter. The ANC has a proud history and
the very existence of a non-racial, democratic South African parliament owes
everything to the decades-long liberation struggle led by the ANC. It is
unconscionable that opposition parties old and new, with tarnished origins,
have been gifted with the opportunity to occupy the moral and political high
ground within the National Assembly. We call on the ANC parliamentary caucus
not to be narrowly defensive in the necessary introspection that must now
follow.

 

President Zuma's acknowledgment that "with hindsight, there are many matters
that could have been handled differently and which should never have been
allowed to drag on this long" is correct. It lays the basis for a range of
further lines of inquiry, reflection and, above all, corrective action. The
SACP has long believed that the Nkandla matter should have been handled
differently and more expeditiously. The ANC leadership needs to reflect
critically on the capacities and motives of a circle of informal
presidential courtiers, flatterers, patrons, factionalists and hangers-on.
It is a circle that, in our view, continuously and prejudicially exposes the
presidency.

 

It is for this reason that we believe that the Concourt judgement and the
dangers of corporate capture are not unconnected. Ever since the 1994
democratic breakthrough the SACP has consistently warned about and exposed
instances of corporate capture. We argued that the 1996 adoption of the GEAR
macro-economic policy package reflected serious corporate ideological
inroads into our movement and state institutions. We mobilised against the
role of Brett Kebble and his criminal circle in perverting strategic parts
of the criminal justice system and in particular its seduction and
perversion of an ANC Youth League leadership. We exposed former ANC YL's
Julius Malema's campaign for the "nationalisation of the mines" for what it
really was - corporate capture of a new kind. Malema's "nationalisation"
campaign was co-ordinated and funded by BEE mining interests at a time when
their highly-leveraged mining shares were under water. The "nationalisation"
call was little more than an attempt to bail these interests out at public
expense.

 

More recently, the SACP has blown the whistle on Koos Bekker's
Naspers/Multichoice/Media24 empire and the manner in which it has
infiltrated key state departments, delayed the much needed digital migration
process, and undermined the public mandate of the SABC.

 

Our grave concern about growing evidence of a web of corporate capture
interventions by the Gupta family is, therefore, neither a new concern nor,
emphatically, a siding with one wing of capitalism against another. The SACP
has been a consistent fighter against the role of monopoly capital and the
way in which it has locked South Africa's political economy into a
semi-peripheral role within the global imperialist system. It is a
semi-peripheral role that is now in deep trouble, reproducing
de-industrialisation, capital flight, the squeezing out of small
enterprises, and crisis levels of unemployment, poverty, household
indebtedness, and inequality.

 

We cannot, as a country, engage actively in a transformation struggle
against monopoly capital to overcome these challenges without a
strategically disciplined and developmentally oriented state. We cannot
defend our democratic national sovereignty, we cannot staunch the massive
illicit exodus of capital out of our country, if critical state institutions
like the South African Revenue Services are captured by corporate interests
who are more interested in covering up wrong-doing and using state
investigative capacity in factional battles. 

 

We therefore reject with contempt the suggestion that blowing the whistle on
the Gupta family is a diversion from the struggle against established
monopoly capital.

 

Thursday's Concourt judgement and the widespread positive public reaction to
it provide an important opportunity for the ANC and the ANC-led movement to
seriously embark on a collective process of decisive self-introspection and
self-correction. Strict implementation of the remedial measures called for
by the Public Protector on Nkandla will be a beginning, but self-correction
must clearly go way beyond this.

 

 

Issued by the South African Communist Party Political Bureau 

 

Contact:

Alex Mohubetswane Mashilo, National Spokesperson, 082 920 0308

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to