New Age2.png

 

 

Nhleko challenges SACP

 

Police minister slams the SA Communist Party for questioning the integrity
of the SA Police Service

 

 

Dennis Cruywagen, The New Age, Johannesburg, 25 May 2016

 

Police Minister Nathi Nhleko has come out batting strongly for the
leadership of the South African Police Service and slammed the South African
Communist Party (SACP) for questioning their integrity. 

 

At a press briefing yesterday, he spoke about the SAPS and the public
discourse about it during the past few days. 

 

"We have taken a position to stop and clarify some issues. Particularly
given the fact that there have been a number of issues in the public space
recently," Nhleko said. 

 

"In a sense, everything has been said about us and for us and we just do
things. It can only be correct for us to begin to clarify some of the
matters." 

 

Accusations that some officers were from the apartheid era were extremely
divisive. 

 

"It is an issue that cannot be taken to its logical conclusion. It has the
potential to tear the country apart," Nhleko said.

 

Emphasising that there were no step-South Africans, he said: "So for us, the
manner of argumentation is irresponsible and unsustainable and because we
work in the security environment we can advise all and sundry - just simply
don't go there. 

 

"It's not worth our efforts. We must work for unity and not division." 

 

Defending the head of the National Prosecuting Authority, Shaun Abrahams,
Nhleko said there was a growing tendency to attack public officials. "That
tendency is dangerous."

 

He referred to the political criticism of Abrahams, which was made after the
latter had resolved to appeal a court decision that charges against
President Jacob Zuma should be reinstated. 

 

Some of the criticism, he said, was that Abrahams was there to serve the
political head of state. 

 

People like Abrahams did not have a political platform from which to defend
themselves and it was unfair to subject them to criticism. 

 

Taking a swipe at the SACP, Nhleko condemned it for claiming the Hawks
investigation into Gordhan was politically motivated. 

 

He found it puzzling, he said, that the party was criticising others because
of rumours. 

 

"The SACP statement issued alleges political motivation as the real reason. 

 

"We dispute this and challenge not only the SACP but all South Africans to
show us one political organisation whose members have not, at one time or
another, faced the focused eye of law enforcement or any one organisation
that has not had its members investigated for one reason or the other." 

 

Nhleko urged those with information which the police did not possess to make
that information available. As to the allegations swirling around the
alleged involvement of Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan with a SARS rogue
unit, he was clear: "There are no charges. There can only be charges as and
when an investigation is completed. 

 

"Therefore, it's incorrect for us to be talking about an investigation. An
investigation has to be completed."

 

[email protected]

 

 

From: http://tnaepaper.co.za/DRIVE/main%20edition/25052016/epaperpdf/4.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to