MortarBoardCU.jpg

 

 

The myth about the revolutionary character of the Economic Freedom Fighters

 

 

Phatse Justice Piitso, 2 June 2016

 

A few years ago our country witnessed the birth of a new movement within the
South African political landscape. The Economic Freedom Fighters has grown
to be a political animal to reckon with in the corridors of power relations
of our society.

 

The phenomenal growth of the new born baby from the womb of the mother has
distinguished itself to be amongst the most vibrant political movements of
our time. Its caricature has become a paradox wave of a new momentum to our
historical realities.

 

At the same time the improved new conditions of our transition to democracy
necessitate a complete metamorphosis of a new path. The history of our
struggle reckons that a revolution cannot be led by the unled.

 

The parade of events of our transition requires a deeper analysis of the
balance of forces and the extent they impact on the pace of our struggle for
socio economic transformation. This is the barometer to measure the
qualitative leaps of our struggle to democracy.

 

Russian Revolution Centenary.jpg

 

The question we ask is whether the EFF is indeed a revolutionary movement or
just an anarchist pseudo revolutionary movement. Whether is indeed an
independent militant movement with its own agenda or just a mere copycat or
a faction of rebels without a cause from the giant liberation movement the
ANC.

 

The founding manifesto of the EFF defines its political character and
posture as a Marxist, Leninist and Fanonian movement. This is an ardent
philosophic chapter presenting the movement as a militant, radical,
fearless, and a fervent opponent of the world imperialism.

 

Throughout the world Marxism Leninism and idealism are the only distinct
theories for transformation of society. These are the only two world
theoretical outlooks which define the two worlds of capitalism and
communism.

 

The dialectical theory of Marxism Leninism upholds the communist party to be
the only standard bearer of the struggle of the working class. This is the
common feature which defines the character of the communist movement
throughout the world.

 

In other words there is no a worldwide movement which carries the political
interests of the working class called the EFF. Its theory is not the most
advanced to guide the worldwide struggle of our transition from capitalism
into socialism.

 

Therefore throughout the world there is only one communist party. From the
East to the West, from the South to the North, there is only one communist
party of South Africa, China, Cuba, Vietnam, Russia, Britain, Nicaragua,
India, USA, Venezuela, Bolivia, Cuba, etc.

 

There is no a movement called the EFF which has occupied the central stage
to lead the worldwide struggle of the working class. Therefore the EFF
cannot declare itself to be the heartbeat of the unity of the struggle of
the people of our country.

 

We all need to understand that the entire history of Marxism Leninism is
marked by the emergence of its opposite, which is opportunism. Vladimir
Lenin wrote that "the doctrine of Marxism had to fight at every step in its
course, one battle after another, against political stupidity, vulgarity and
opportunism."

 

Therefore the struggle between Marxism Leninism and opportunism has been a
struggle between those who want to defend the unity of the working class and
those who want to sow the seeds of division; the struggle between
revolutionary forces and forces of counter revolution.

 

The manifesto of the Communist party states that those who believe in the
theory of Marxism Leninism do not form separate parties opposed to other
working class parties. It further states that they do not set up any
sectarian principles of their own, by which to shape and mound the movement
of the working class.

 

Communist Star small.png

 

The EFF has an ambiguous theoretical posture reminiscent of an amorphous
pseudo-revolutionary movement of the 21th century. Its core theory is the
main characteristic feature of a fascist movement deriving its existence
from the crisis of our modern capitalism.

 

What is boggling the mind is the high speed chase of the movement to plant
the seeds of counter revolution in our country. Its rank and file has been
transformed into an opium of praise singers of left wing communism and
infantile disorder.

 

A daunting task before us is to liberate society from the consciousness of
personality cult. Our foremost task is the collective wisdom of our people
to illuminates hope to the future generations of man to come.

 

Few years ago, it was painful to witness the ugly hand of those entrusted
with the responsibility to lead our people turning the province of Limpopo
into an amphitheatre of corruption. Their quest was to transform the
provincial administration into a milking cow for corruption and money
laundering.

 

The core nucleus of the nest of the looters are the ones masquerading before
the masses of our people as modern day revolutionaries of the EFF. History
does not repeat itself.

 

Our country cannot be led by a anarchist movement which its birthmarks are
the bloodbath of the sufferings, hunger and poverty of our people. It is
untold that the a movement of fugitives from the law can led the struggle of
the working class of our country.

 

Since the launch of the Economic Freedom Fighters there has been an
increased momentum of violent demonstrations in our country. The rampant
scales of communities burning and destroying public property has reached
alarming proportions.

 

LeninProfile.jpg

 

It is therefore not far-fetched to insinuate that the EFF is behind the
spate of violent acts of demonstrations throughout our country. This is
demonstrated by its principal strategy of violence and anarchy as a tool for
mobilization.

 

This culture of anarchy is so endemic that we see episodes where people burn
schools in their demand for the building of new clinics, community centres
and job creation projects. What we are witnessing are unprecedented acts of
anarchy which were never there in the history of the struggle of our people.

 

At the same time we must dare not to forget the determination by the
monopolies to hold political and economic power in many of the former
colonies and semi colonies. Imperialism is imposing a new strategy of
bankrolling fascist movements to undermine the sovereignty and self
determination of the developing nations

 

Through opportunists movements like the EFF, imperialism seeks to obliterate
from the minds of young people the history and political leadership role of
liberation movements in their struggle for freedom and democracy. Therefore
the EFF is just the component part of the world counter revolutionary
movement.

 

In the year 1905 the congress of the Bolshevik party held at Tammersfors in
Finland adopted a historic revolutionary principle of democratic centralism.
Few amongst the delegates at the presidium of the congress opposed to this
theoretical concept was Joseph Stalin.

 

He was highly convinced that instead of the leadership elected on the basis
of the will of the majority, a vanguard party should be led by a permanent
staff of group of leaders who could not be subjected to the periodic demands
of hazardous elections.

 

His argument was that commanders cannot be elected from the army during the
war.

 

In his response to the political arguments from Stalin during the
proceedings of the plenary of the congress, the leader of the Russian
revolution Vladimir Lenin had to say the following profound preposition:

 

"There is nothing to be done about it, the new circumstances call for the
new forms, after all nothing has changed, the rulers are those who rule and
not those who vote, and it depends on those who rule to see to it that they
are always elected"

 

At the end of the congress the majority of delegates unanimously supported
the view that a vanguard party should be organized in accordance with the
principle of democratic centralism. This was the basis to distinguish
Bolshevism from Menshevism.

 

The Tammersfors congress elucidated the resolution on democratic centralism
in the following way:

 

"recognizing as indisputable the principle of democratic centralism, the
conference considers the broad implementation of the elective principles
necessary, and, while granting elected centres full powers in matters of
ideological and practical leadership, they are at the same time subject to a
recall, their actions are given broad publicity, and they are to be strictly
accountable to the activities of the party".

 

I have elected to refer myself to this historic episode to bring to the fore
the fact that the EFF is nothing else but a toxic faction from our national
liberation movement. It has broken ranks from our revolutionary movement on
the basis that they could not respect the principle of democratic centralism
which is about the views of the majority and organizational discipline.

 

 

.    Phatse Justice Piitso is the former Ambassador to the republic of Cuba
and the former provincial secretary of the SACP writing this article on his
personal capacity.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to