I'm not sure that makes a lot of sense. Horrible UI, too.

For what it's worth, the two other reasons for forcing privacy on the
imports are:
a) people frequently have corporate-internal sites that shouldn't be
exposed and need to be checked by hand
b) various places would get spammed by valid but boring links from the
various browser defaults.
 
I like the idea of seeing all private items (perhaps an automatically
added tag) and want there to be an easier way to modify items in bulk.
 
We do see a great deal of spam activity currently.
 
Joshua
 



  _____  

        From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Sib
        Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:21 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [ydn-delicious] Re: sharing all / privatizing all
        
        

        Hi Joshua,
        
        Joshua Schachter wrote:
        > We current do that on registration. You want us to have that
on every
        > post too? How about the API, etc?
        > 
        > The problem is deeper than you think, unfortunately.
        > 
        I think the suggestion is not to do it on every post, but on
every batch 
        sharing operation.
        I guess it wouldn't help much, though, as we are not talking
about 
        robots, here, but humans.
        
        I have two suggestions:
        - use the anti-spam keyword idea, as suggested by somercamb, and
limit 
        the batch operation to only 20, 50 or 100 bookmarks at a time.
This way, 
        for someone legitimately sharing a new import, it would be a bit

        annoying, but not so much. For a massive spammer, it would be
really 
        annoying
        - keep a record of batch operation. That way, if spam is
reported on 
        such an operation, you could roll it back
        
        There is one question I'm wondering: what kind of spam are we
talking 
        about here, for what volume?
        
        Cheers,
        
        Ben
        >
        > _____ 
        >
        > From: [email protected]
<mailto:ydn-delicious%40yahoogroups.com> 
        > [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:ydn-delicious%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of somercamb
        > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:23 AM
        > To: [email protected]
<mailto:ydn-delicious%40yahoogroups.com> 
        > Subject: [ydn-delicious] Re: sharing all / privatizing all
        > 
        > 
        >
        > if that is the answer, then why not create an anti-spam
keyword 
        > feature where you're forced to enter a word shown in a
graphic,
        > like 
        > so many websites and bloggers do already
        > 
        

         



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ydn-delicious/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ydn-delicious/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to