Thanks Dr. Sacco. I'll review it with great interest! Golly, gee,
maybe there is a Santa after all.
Thanks again, for that reference.
Here's something I was keeping to myself as I'm not sure how many are
really interested in these areas. Maybe there'll be something here
which interests you:
http://www.ifs.uni-linz.ac.at/ifs/research/areas/areas.html
Thanks again Dr. Sacco.
Sincerely, Derick.
On Dec 25, 2005, at 8:51 AM, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
Ain't technology grand? Gordon Moore was correct. As someone who owns
a dual processor 533MHz G4 PowerMac, I certainly understand
development time, time to market, and timed obsolescence.
Processor design is now more easily tailored towards an intended
application. The Xbox processor series is a case in point.
Found a paper on the WEB entitled "Multicore, dual-core, and the
future of Intel". It is a bit dated, but interesting.
http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/cpu/intel-future.ars/1
-Joseph
======================================================================
Derick Centeno wrote:
Consider this: Plot down enough cash now and one can stem onrushing
obselescence for a few months, maybe?
Oopps, excuse me. It already is obsolete. The Xbox is a PPC
tri-core system with each core running at 3.62 GHz and a 500 MB ATI
graphics card???
No blinking allowed, folks. A quiet ... my gosh, will be sufficient.
--
joseph_sacco [at] comcast [dot] net
_______________________________________________
yellowdog-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general
HINT: to Google archives, try '<keywords> site:terrasoftsolutions.com'
_______________________________________________
yellowdog-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general
HINT: to Google archives, try '<keywords> site:terrasoftsolutions.com'
