> -----Original Message----- > From: Mittal, Anuj <anuj.mit...@intel.com> > Sent: Thursday, 20 February, 2020 11:35 AM > To: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>; akuster808 > <akuster...@gmail.com>; Jain, Sangeeta <sangeeta.j...@intel.com>; > yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org > Cc: ota...@ossystems.com.br; yi.z...@windriver.com; Sangal, Apoorv > <apoorv.san...@intel.com>; Yeoh, Ee Peng <ee.peng.y...@intel.com>; Chan, > Aaron Chun Yew <aaron.chun.yew.c...@intel.com>; sjolley.yp...@gmail.com; > Tummalapalli, Vineela <vineela.tummalapa...@intel.com> > Subject: RE: [yocto] QA Cycle report for build (yocto-3.0.2.rc2) > > > On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 14:41 -0800, akuster808 wrote: > > > > > > On 2/18/20 11:33 PM, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > This is the full report for yocto-3.0.2.rc2: > > > > https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contr > > > > ib > > > > /tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults > > > > > > > > ======= Summary ======== > > > > No high milestone defects. > > > > one new defects are found in this cycle - oeqa/runtime test > > > > 'test_dnf_exclude' failed (Bugid:13797) openssh ptest failed (BUG > > > > id:13796) bash ptest failed (BUG id:13795) > > > > > > > > ======= Bugs ======== > > > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797 > > From the error log, it looks like we are trying to install 7.67 while zeus > has 7.66 > so it errors out. I am guessing that curl wasn't built in a clean build > directory so > the correct version of curl is deployed. Can this test be re-run please? Re-run the test in new build directory and after having 'bitbake curl'. It is passing now. Updating bug in Bugzila.
> > > > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13796 > > This needs: > > https://github.com/openssh/openssh- > portable/commit/ff31f15773ee173502eec4d7861ec56f26bba381 > > > > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795 > > Was because of the bash CVE patch. > > > > > > > Thank you for logging the defects. > > > > > > I suspect this in now in the hands of the YP TSC. > > > > What is the stable maintainer's thoughts on this? > > > > In particular I'm worried about the bash patch and whether the ptest > > regression above is related to that or not? Any recommendation? > > Looks like it's related but I don't think the impact is much. The test is > failing > because the line number that is expected to fail changed (because of the lines > being added in the test). So we should be okay in my opinion. > > Thanks, > > Anuj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#48520): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/48520 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/71391111/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
