Add list. missed earlier. On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:11 AM Vinayak Menon <menon.vina...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 2:56 PM tomzy <tomasz.zyjew...@3mdeb.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks Tomasz. I will check kas. > > > > No problem > > > > Yes, for selecting some of the packages I have created prod and debug image > > recipes.But this did not work for the kernel as the kernel recipe is picked > > as part of PROVIDERin machine conf. > > > > What are the difference there? You want to use different config on prod and > > debug images? > > Maybe add it as config fragments? Then you would need to add some global > > variable to > > distinguish when use given .cfg file. > > Ya, and I am using exisitng IMAGE_FEATURE instead of the global var. I > can use global var too. > The only thing is that I am setting the global var from a conf and not > image recipe. > > > > > [1] > > https://docs.yoctoproject.org/singleindex.html#creating-configuration-fragments > > > > SoI had to use 2 conf to have the > > IMAGE_FEATURES (orany other var)set differently for prod and debug. This is > > for > > building the kernelrecipie differently for prodand debug. Setting the > > IMAGE_FEATURES in the image recipe (and not inconf) causes2 problems. One is > > that kernel and other bootloaders recipes are picked early via PROVIDER in > > conf > > and not as packages included in image recipe. > > > > Is that a problem? > > Ya you are right, that is not a problem as such. But I have seen in the yocto > documentation that IMAGE_FEATURES are recommended to be set from conf. > Is there any reason for such a recommendation ? > > > > > Secondly,setting the var in the > > image recipe breaks this command for e.g. > > "bitbake base-image-prod.bbbase-image-debug.bb". > > > > Didn't you want to distinguish this to builds to be able to run `bitbake > > base-image-prod` or > > `bitbake base-image-debug`? > > Yes I want to distinguish, and as a developer I can give separate > bitbake commands. But the > thought was that later the user can issue commands the way they want. > And if they use it in > combined manner described above, expecting 2 images with different > kernels, it does not work. > > > > > > Since the command parses the recipes only once for both image creation. > > > > > > Nevertheless I would greatly recommend you to use kas. In simple .yml file > > you > > could prepare different `local.conf` per configuration prod/debug. > > Sure, I will explore this. > > > > > > [2] > > https://kas.readthedocs.io/en/latest/userguide.html#project-configuration > > > > Regards, > > Tomasz Żyjewski > > Embedded Systems Engineer > > GPG: 5C495EA3EBEECA59 > > https://3mdeb.com | @3mdeb_com > > > > > > > > > > > -- > vinayak
-- vinayak
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#56347): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/56347 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/89469781/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
