On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 01:13 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
Hi Richard,
Jumping on this thread to provide some clarifications as I hit the same bug.
I can confirm that this is not an environment issue. I could reproduce it by
adding a sudo call in an empty recipe like this:
SUMMARY = ""
HOMEPAGE = ""
LICENSE = ""
SECTION = ""
DEPENDS = ""
SRC_URI = ""
do_install() {
ls -l /usr/bin/sudo
sudo ls -l /usr/bin/sudo
}
Running bitbake barebone on my x86 machine produces this error:
| -rwxr-xr-x 1 nobody 65534 232416 Mar 1 13:59 /usr/bin/sudo
| sudo: /etc/sudo.conf is owned by uid 65534, should be 0
| sudo: /etc/sudo.conf is owned by uid 65534, should be 0
| sudo: error in /etc/sudo.conf, line 0 while loading plugin "sudoers_policy"
| sudo: /usr/libexec/sudo/sudoers.so must be owned by uid 0
| sudo: fatal error, unable to load plugins
Indeed it seems that ownership is broken somehow in the bb environment. The
issue was introduced somewhere between dunfell and kirkstone. I know it's a
large timespan but it's a bit time consuming to narrow it down.
Hoping to get some help on this. I would try to investigate further myself but
I have no idea where to start to be honest.
Best regards,
--Adrian
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#59594): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/59594
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/96733939/21656
Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
