On 10-12-13 11:47 AM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 12/13/2010 01:20 AM, Yu, Ke wrote:
Hi,
I hate to raise this question, but there is still bunch of bugs that
is fixed but not verified. According to the process, it is reporter's
responsibility to verify the bug, so could I ask the reporter's help
on this? Process is sometime tedious but helpful to quality
assurance. Thanks a lot for your effort.
I have now verified all my bugs.
However, the process doesn't seem right to me. As the person who fixed
the bug, presumably I performed verification that my fix actually works,
which is why I marked the bug as fixed to begin with.
At every other company I've been with, bug verification is performed by
the QA team - and I think the purpose of it is to ensure someone other
than the developer who fixed the bug can independently verify the bug is
indeed resolved. A second pair of eyes can spot new problems more easily.
I'd second Scott's opinion here. I wasn't marking my bugs
as verified, since as a submitter, I've never had to do
this in 10+ years in the 'biz'.
Cheers,
Bruce
JMO,
Scott
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
