Robert, I know that and will work towards that end as well. There are a lot of holdover things in our docs.
Thanks, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Robert P. J. Day [mailto:rpj...@crashcourse.ca] Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 7:29 AM To: Rifenbark, Scott M Cc: Richard Purdie; Darren Hart; yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: RE: [yocto] docs: how to spell "bitbake", and docbook semantic markup for user input On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: > Agreed that BitBake is the correct spelling. I will be sure to make > a sweep through our Yocto manuals and make sure that when we are > referring to the tool and not indicating the command they say > "BitBake". and while you're at it, i was once lectured sternly that the proper spelling is "Git" when talking about the tool and "git" when referring to the actual command. never "GIT". at least that what i was told. do with that what you wish. rday p.s. since i am, at this very moment, immersed in an XML publishing toolchain, i will probably have some thoughts on docbook markup in the near future. stay tuned ... _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto