On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:57 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 06:17 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:27 -0500, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: > > > From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> > > > > > > oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428 > > > broke meta-intel x86_64 builds: > > > > > > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies > > > ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but > > > /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb > > > RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it) > > > ERROR: initramfs-live-install was skipped: incompatible with host > > > x86_64-poky-linux > > > > > > This patchset restores the build. > > > > > > Build and install-tested on sugarbay and crownbay. > > > > > > More fixes for [YOCTO #1428] > > > > > > The following changes since commit > > > b86f811663d834064af1e6778c408eb904fad0b9: > > > Darren Hart (1): > > > n450: update linux-yocto PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.0% > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi/1428-fix > > > > > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/log/?h=tzanussi/1428-fix > > > > > > Tom Zanussi (2): > > > meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install > > > meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend > > > > Is there a disadvantage to moving to grub2 in OE-Core and then bringing > > these pieces into sync? > > > > Yes, it would make sense - the plan was to do that during the 1.2 > cycle...
If someone can confirm that 32 and 64 bit live images work with grub2 and there is no good reason not to do this, I'd be in favour of doing this now rather than explain why its a mess... Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
