On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote: > > (yes, i *am* going to be this pedantic all day long. at least until > football starts.) > > over at > http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-1.1/toolchain/, > a couple optional fixups: > > 1) the toolchain ...i686-x86_64... doesn't appear to belong under the > x86-64 directory. (it *does* live properly under the i686 directory.) > > 2) the directory name is "x86-64" while all the toolchain tarball > names contain "x86_64". any reason why these can't be consistent? > what's the standard? it just seems confusing to keep bouncing back > and forth. >
since x86_64 (which is more familiar) has an 'underscore' in it and bitbake reserved that for overrides we had a potential conflict here thats why alternate name x86-64 is used actually they both mean the same thing. > rday > > -- > > ======================================================================== > Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA > http://crashcourse.ca > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday > LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday > ======================================================================== > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
