On 4/16/12 8:01 PM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
Hi,
I am testing beagleboard with RPM, and there is a question I am confused
with that PACKAGE_ARCH is renamed for certain packages. For example the
"acl" package, whose expected PACKAGE_ARCH is "armv7a-vfp-neon", however
in RPM file, the arch is renamed to "armv7a", see
"acl-2.2.51-r2.armv7a.rpm". However IPK package still shows
"acl_2.2.51-r2_armv7a-vfp-neon.ipk".
Could anybody give hint on this?
Thanks,
Dongxiao
I've not seen that happen before. Can you checked if an
acl-...armv7a-vfp-neon.rpm was generated and RPM is simply not using it, or was
it never generated?
As another user mentioned, it is possible for a package to say it wants a
specific arch type, but if it did -- it should be consistent between packaging
systems.
--Mark
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
