On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> >> wrote: >> > On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, Khem Raj wrote: >> > >> >> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Yury Bushmelev <jay4m...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Have you seen Qi-Hardware's Ben NanoNote? >> >> > http://en.qi-hardware.com/wiki/Ben_NanoNote >> >> > >> >> >> >> yes I know that it uses MIPS32 based processor and my inclination is >> >> to use mips64 based cpu thats why I am more interested in lemote. >> > >> > the only issue i see is that that netbook is $449 in the US: >> > >> > http://www.amazon.com/Screen-Lemote-Yeeloong-8101_B-Netbook/dp/B005XH10NQ/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1319989211&sr=8-2?tag=electronicfro-20 >> > >> > and that strikes me as excessively expensive for a MIPS dev kit. when >> > beagles and pandas are giving people sub-$200 ARM kits, more than >> > doubling that price for a MIPS kit is a big jump unless you can buy >> > just the board for much less. >> >> They also have fuloong (mini PC) which is said to be around 250 >> NanoNote aint that bad a choice I think from price POV > > ah, that's more reasonable. sorry for dragging out this thread so > long but i'd really like a stable of boards/kits for teaching embedded > linux and it would be nice if there was one for each main architecture > in the price range of a beagle xm or panda es (< $200). > > i'll shut up now and just watch the list for someone to someday > announce the next yocto-supported MIPS board that would fit the bill. >
I think fuloong(mips64/mips32) and NanoNote both look reasonable choices at this time. I personally think NanoNote would need less work to get it shoe horned into yocto BSP space _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto