hi Raj: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Dennis.Yxun <dennis.y...@gmail.com> wrote: >> HI ALL: >> Sorry for crossing post, but I'm quite new here, so if I did >> something wrong, please point me the right direction. thanks >> I'm using oe-core, and notice that mipsel support(o32, little >> endian mode) is missing (current available choose is: qemumips, >> qemumips64, qemumips64el). >> So, here I'm trying to bring up qemumipsel support . My first >> attempt would just make qemumipsel work, >> further would make it running on real board, thus maybe mips4kec, >> mips24k, mips74k chips. >> What I achieved here current: >> 1) toolchain/basic libs, utilities should works ,only one changes, >> see my patch [a] >> for mipsel we also have to filter out -march=mips32, previously we >> only handle mips (the big endian?) >> don't have the error message now, but if you request, I can provide. >> 2) attempt to compile kernel to support qemumipsel, unfortunately it fail. >> The point here is linux-yocto doesn't support qemumipsel, but merely >> support those other three mips arches, >> So here is my attempt patch [b], and the fail log [c], complied out >> binary still big endian. >> >> Could my patch [a] be accepted? or should I send with another mail >> for better review? >> Is it better to request a ticket in yocto's bugzilla? or just >> report here, I'm not quite sure. >> >> Dennis >> >> [a] 0001-eglibc-support-mipsel-little-endian-filter-out-march.patch > > This patch is appropriate for OE-Core, I will add it to my tree. > >> [b] 0002-qemu-attempt-to-add-mipsel-little-endian-support-but.patch > > This looks good to me but I will leave it to Bruce to decide. > >> [c] build_log.txt >> [d] log.do_package >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
I'm quite confident with patch [a], but not sure with patch [b], since it should point to a sanity SRCREV which works for "qemumipsel" - little endian side, but here I'm simply duplicate from qemumips (the big endian port). should confirm?! _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
