On 07/31/2012 11:06 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 06:43:17 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i notice that the current meta-ti layer has a pandaboard.conf file
that refers specifically to the OMAP 4430 -- the original panda.
this weekend, i'd like to build, say, a core-image-minimal for my ES.
is there a writeup anywhere that documents what issues i might run
into regarding the panda versus the panda ES? thanks.
I'm not sure but I think you probably need to direct this question to the
meta-ti mailing list.
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
I did see this question, I just don't have an answer. We are seeing if
we can get a part time maintainer for panda lined up. Right now it is
just something a few volunteers did a few months ago. There are no
product level plans for panda and Yocto.
I hope to get panda on the list of platforms for nightly (or at least
weekly) builds. That way the status will be visible.
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
