On 08/01/2012 07:50 AM, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
Hello Scott, all,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Leon Woestenberg
<sidebranch.openembed...@gmail.com
<mailto:sidebranch.openembed...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Scott,
I tested your denzil-next branch but found breakage that will not
fail the (auto) build.
I'm hitting the "Warning: ${DTS_FILE} is not available!" case.
Disregard the breakage. Local user error; my KERNEL_DEVICETREE missed
the "${S}" prefix.
However, that being said, should we silently fail with a warning of the
specified device tree (DTS) is missing? This is clearly a change of
behaviour that makes the build prone to user errors, as I just demonstrated.
I rather have the build fail.
Hi Leon,
Thanks for bringing this up. I believe Matthew made the original request
for this commit (linux-dtb: add multi-dtb build support,
a40d795ee97d8ada6a0b76c9741a8653fd646893). I'm cc:'ing him on this email
as well as Richard Purdie, who has yet to review the new commits in my
denzil-next branch and may also have some input on this issue.
The question in my mind right now is whether this change is too
risky/change-inducing for a point-release.
Scott
--
Scott Garman
Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project
Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
