Hi @all, I'm having some trouble building a BSP supporting two different machines. The machines in question are the Stamp9g20 and PortuxG20 from taskit. These machines are just slightly different course the PortuxG20 is basically just a small SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
You can have a look at my BSP here: http://bitbucket.org/imko/meta-stamp9g20 but take attention that you're selecting the denzil branch... If I set MACHINE = stamp9g20 in local.conf all went fine, but with MACHINE = portuxg20 I get a kernel for common-pc instead of arm-versatile-926ejs ... Comparing the output of "bitbake -e linux-yocto" for both MACHINE settings I notice that for stamp9g20 KMACHINE is "stamp9g20" but for portuxg20 it's "common-pc", which results in these "updateme" command: | updateme --branch standard/default/arm-versatile-926ejs -DKDESC=common-pc:standard | --feature features/netfilter --feature features/taskstats arm common-pc | poky/meta-stamp9g20/recipes-kernel/linux/files/hardware.cfg | poky/meta-stamp9g20/recipes-kernel/linux/files/non-hardware.cfg | poky/meta-stamp9g20/recipes-kernel/linux/files/portuxg20/portuxg20.cfg | poky/meta-stamp9g20/recipes-kernel/linux/files/portuxg20/portuxg20-preempt-rt.scc | poky/meta-stamp9g20/recipes-kernel/linux/files/portuxg20/portuxg20.scc | poky/meta-stamp9g20/recipes-kernel/linux/files/portuxg20/portuxg20-standard.scc Which again (I think ...) leads to a kernel compile error ... Unfortunately I was not able to find out why the KMACHINE variable is not setup correctly with my BSP for PortuxG20 ... Please can someone have a look? ;-) Cheers, Markus _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto