On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 16:20 +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Patch Makefile.in to allow test programs be built on host and ran on
> target.
> Patch tests/run-all to output PASS/FAIL for each testcase.
> Patch recipe to build and install test programs and test suite.
>
> ---
> .../bash/bash-4.2/build-tests.patch | 29
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> meta/recipes-extended/bash/bash-4.2/run-ptest | 2 +
> .../bash/bash-4.2/test-output.patch | 19 +++++++++++++
> meta/recipes-extended/bash/bash.inc | 18 ++++++++++++
> meta/recipes-extended/bash/bash_4.2.bb | 5 +++-
> 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/bash/bash-4.2/build-tests.patch
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/bash/bash-4.2/run-ptest
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/bash/bash-4.2/test-output.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/bash/bash-4.2/build-tests.patch
> b/meta/recipes-extended/bash/bash-4.2/build-tests.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e92fab3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/bash/bash-4.2/build-tests.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +diff -uNr a/Makefile.in b/Makefile.in
> +--- a/Makefile.in 2012-06-14 10:15:15.063465304 +0200
> ++++ b/Makefile.in 2012-06-14 10:47:02.985115849 +0200
> +@@ -827,18 +827,21 @@
> + fi
> +
> + recho$(EXEEXT): $(SUPPORT_SRC)recho.c
> +- @$(CC_FOR_BUILD) $(CCFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) -o $@ $(SUPPORT_SRC)recho.c
> ${LIBS_FOR_BUILD}
> ++ @$(CC) $(CCFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $<
> +
> + zecho$(EXEEXT): $(SUPPORT_SRC)zecho.c
> +- @$(CC_FOR_BUILD) $(CCFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) -o $@ $(SUPPORT_SRC)zecho.c
> ${LIBS_FOR_BUILD}
> ++ @$(CC) $(CCFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $<
> +
> + printenv$(EXEEXT): $(SUPPORT_SRC)printenv.c
> +- @$(CC_FOR_BUILD) $(CCFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) -o $@ $(SUPPORT_SRC)printenv.c
> ${LIBS_FOR_BUILD}
> ++ @$(CC) $(CCFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $<
> +
> + xcase$(EXEEXT): $(SUPPORT_SRC)xcase.c
> +- @$(CC_FOR_BUILD) $(CCFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) -o $@ $(SUPPORT_SRC)xcase.c
> ${LIBS_FOR_BUILD}
> ++ @$(CC) $(CCFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $<
> +
> + test tests check: force $(Program) $(TESTS_SUPPORT)
> ++ $(MAKE) runtest
> ++
> ++runtest:
> + @-test -d tests || mkdir tests
> + @cp $(TESTS_SUPPORT) tests
> + @( cd $(srcdir)/tests && \
As it stands, I can bet on upstream saying "no" to this for good reason.
A better concept might be to introduce $(CC_FOR_TEST) which could
default to CC_FOR_BUILD. This would let us do what you're thinking here
yet keep upstream happy too.
Just thinking out loud really...
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
