On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:38 AM, <b40...@freescale.com> wrote: >> From: Chunrong Guo <b40...@freescale.com> >> >> fix perf ERROR: oe_runmake failed >> >> Signed-off-by: Chunrong Guo <b40...@freescale.com> >> --- >> .../perf/files/define-attribute-const.patch | 13 +++++++++++++ >> recipes-append/perf/perf_3.4.bbappend | 7 +++++++ >> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 recipes-append/perf/files/define-attribute-const.patch >> create mode 100644 recipes-append/perf/perf_3.4.bbappend >> > > Out of curiosity .. why not patch the FSL kernel itself ? That's where the > source for perf comes from, and that will ensure any perf recipe will build > when that kernel source is used. We've been fixing perf issues within the > linux-yocto repo for some time, that way the changes are matched to the > kernel that has the problem, not the layer + toolchain which can have a > changing kernel underneath it. > > Just a random question.
I agree. But, for the already released kernel already on git.freescale.com we will need these patches. Chunrong, Please send a pull request to our linux tree maintainer to get these patches added to our next kernel. -M _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto