On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:08:30PM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 1 March 2013 21:53, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think it would be good to finish discussion in thread > > [OE-core] RFE: make the init manager an image feature (again) > > and resolve systemd situation asap, otherwise we're risking > > meta-openembedded release or quality of such release. > > I'm working on a series that implements roughly what I proposed > (systemd and sysvinit features not mutually exclusive, but no separate > -sysv or -systemd packages) and hope to have it on the list next week > - this week has been slow going as we've had a family cold do the > rounds.
Can you answer this http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-February/036223.html and how this solution helps with upgrade paths? > Any contributions of coding are always welcome, obviously. Coding was contributed to meta-systemd which was working fine for both use-cases. Maybe explaining hidden benefits of not splitted packages would motivate some people.. Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
