On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> wrote:
> > This looks good to me now, I still think we'll have some confusion > between the core "rt" images and core-image-realtime that we are > introducing here. > > I may rename it core-image-realtime-extended as part of the merge, > if that's acceptable to you ? I think it will be something that > we'll need to revisit at some point, but that's not a good reason > to hold this back anymore. > > I'll merge, do a quick test and push this out on Monday. "core-image-realtime-extended" or "core-image-rt-extended (to be aligned with existing core-image-rt)" or something along this line sounds fine to me. I was thinking of updating my patch, but it would be better if you decide the final name, so I won't update the patch for now. Or if you know which name is the best, then just let me know, I will update the patch and send it to you. Thank you, Insop _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
