On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 05:35 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:37 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > second, the BBLAYERS example there seems overly complicated and > > > potentially confusing to beginners. the fact that meta-yocto is listed > > > as NON_REMOVABLE might make readers wonder how they're supposed to > > > know that. why not go with something a lot more people will see, like, > > > say: > > > > > > BBLAYERS = ?" \ <-- and that looks like a typo > > > /usr/local/src/yocto/meta \ > > > /usr/local/src/yocto/meta-ti \ > > > " > > > > > > BBLAYERS_NON_REMOVABLE ?= " \ > > > /usr/local/src/yocto/meta \ > > > " > > > > > > > I agree - the whole NON_REMOVABLE thing doesn't add anything and should > > be removed - the example is just trying to show how to add a BSP layer - > > the rest just adds potential confusion. And, yeah, it's a typo.. > > i'll let someone else decide what to do there. > > > > finally, the passing reference to layers that contain sub-BSP-layers > > > is good, but show an example, such as the fact that the meta-crownbay > > > layer.conf file has a dependency on meta-intel: > > > > > > ... > > > LAYERDEPENDS_crownbay = "intel" > > > > > > never pass up the opportunity to reinforce an idea with a few lines > > > of actual code. :-) > > > > > > > Agreed, but on the other hand we don't really want to be too > > intel-specific (I know, we have crownbay everywhere else, but anyway..) > > i was just looking for an example of the kind of hierarchical layer > structure you find in meta-intel. is there another layer that has that > kind of structure? >
A quick scan of all the layers I have opengrokked here doesn't show any either, so possibly meta-intel is currently the only example. If so, let's use it.. Tom > rday > _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto