On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Anders Darander <and...@chargestorm.se> wrote: > > > "Hans Beckérus" <hans.becke...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Anders Darander >><and...@chargestorm.se> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> "Hans Beckérus" <hans.becke...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Hello. I wish to bring in gnupg to our system but from what I can >>tell >>>>gnupg is not part of Yocto nor OpenEmbedded. However, gpgme is. Is >>>>gpgme to consider a complete replacement for gnupg? I have no need >>for >>>>any gpg application libraries, but need the ability to sign and >>>>perhaps encrypt/decrypt information. Is an option here to bring in >>>>gnupg 1.4.13 myself or is this not something you should recommend? >>> >>> Well there are recipes for gnupg versions 1.4.7 and 2.0.19 in >>OE-Core, and this in Yocto. See meta/recipes-support. >>> >> >>Ah. Yes, now I see it. I think my mistake was that I searched for gpg >>not gnupg :( My bad. >>Is there anything that should make me consider 1.4.7 before 2.x? I am >>looking for something as lean as possible since there are very limited >>resources on the target system. Also, 1.4.13 seems to be considered >>current stable. I guess OE is lagging behind somewhat on this package? >> > > Well, 1.4.7 was the last release under GPLv2, which is the primary reason for > keeping it. 2.0 19 is what you'll get when >requesting gnupg from the build > system, unless you either prefer the old version or declare that you don't > want GPLv3 in >your images.
Ok I see. Thanks. GPLv2 vs GPLv3 is not an issue in my case. More important is which version adds the lesser footprint. My guess is that 1.4.x is what I am looking for. But I will try and build both to see which suits the best. Hans On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Anders Darander <and...@chargestorm.se> wrote: > > > "Hans Beckérus" <hans.becke...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Anders Darander >><and...@chargestorm.se> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> "Hans Beckérus" <hans.becke...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Hello. I wish to bring in gnupg to our system but from what I can >>tell >>>>gnupg is not part of Yocto nor OpenEmbedded. However, gpgme is. Is >>>>gpgme to consider a complete replacement for gnupg? I have no need >>for >>>>any gpg application libraries, but need the ability to sign and >>>>perhaps encrypt/decrypt information. Is an option here to bring in >>>>gnupg 1.4.13 myself or is this not something you should recommend? >>> >>> Well there are recipes for gnupg versions 1.4.7 and 2.0.19 in >>OE-Core, and this in Yocto. See meta/recipes-support. >>> >> >>Ah. Yes, now I see it. I think my mistake was that I searched for gpg >>not gnupg :( My bad. >>Is there anything that should make me consider 1.4.7 before 2.x? I am >>looking for something as lean as possible since there are very limited >>resources on the target system. Also, 1.4.13 seems to be considered >>current stable. I guess OE is lagging behind somewhat on this package? >> > > Well, 1.4.7 was the last release under GPLv2, which is the primary reason for > keeping it. 2.0 19 is what you'll get when requesting gnupg from the build > system, unless you either prefer the old version or declare that you don't > want GPLv3 in your images. > > Cheers, > Anders > > -- > Anders Darander > ChargeStorm AB Tel: +46 702 44 84 36 > Laxholmstorget 3 Email: and...@chargestorm.se > 602 21 Norrköping Web: www.chargestorm.se > > Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
