On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > What version of oe-core / bitbake are you working with? > Umm... Is 'dylan' a meaningful answer?
> Sound likeyou are trying a clean build, you could just try "bitbake -e > u-boot" without doing a full build and check those two items, the -e will > also give you the do_compile() task. > Ooo, interesting. 'bitbake -e' all by itself gives me this: ---- # $UBOOT_MACHINE # set /home/ewhac/devel/iMX6/fsl-community-bsp/sources/meta-belis3/conf/machine/ourboard.conf:12 # "mx6dl_sabresd_config" UBOOT_MACHINE="mx6dl_sabresd_config" ---- But 'bitbake -e u-boot' gives me this: ---- # $UBOOT_MACHINE [4 operations] # set /home/ewhac/devel/iMX6/fsl-community-bsp/sources/meta-belis3/conf/machine/ourboard.conf:12 # "mx6dl_sabresd_config" # finalize ast.py:331 [finalize] # "was: mx6dl_sabresd_config" # override[ourboard]:set /home/ewhac/devel/iMX6/fsl-community-bsp/sources/meta-belis3/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-imx_2009.08.bbappend:5 # "mx6_ourboard_config" # finalize override[ourboard]: # "mx6_ourboard_config" # computed: # "mx6_ourboard_config" UBOOT_MACHINE="mx6_ourboard_config" ---- And the generated do_compile() script reflects this. Still not entirely clear why the results differ. Thank you for all the suggestions so far. Schwab _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto