> > On 17 October 2013 11:20, Glenn Schmottlach <gschmottl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Just out of curiosity, is it possible that you added "package-management" >> > to IMAGE_FEATURES after you already had a successful full build? Or is >> > it possible that you had already done a full build with "package_rpm" or >> > "_deb" before switching to "package_ipk"? >> > >> >> I added "package-management" after a successful build. > > In that case, if you have the time, I would delete your tmp, > sstate-cache, and cache directories, as well as your bitbake.lock and > pseudodone files and rebuild. Does that make any difference? >
Unbeknownst to me, the "init" script on the target platform was mounting a tmpfs (ramdisk) filesystem over the top of "/var" thereby hiding the fact that the opkg database had indeed been installed. So, once I realized this it was clear why I wasn't see these files when the target booted. >> > The reason I ask is (although I never confirmed this definitively but) when >> > I was playing with this stuff a while back I was sure that this package >> > stuff >> > would only get generated after adjusting these configurations when a full, >> > clean build was performed (i.e. removing <tmpdir> and <sstate-cache>). > >> After manually copying the /var/lib/opkg to my target the opkg-cl >> command now seems to "work". Unfortunately I'm running into difficulty >> specifying a a new ipkg repo that is mounted via NFS from my >> development machine. How would I make it scan there as well? > > I've never tried that before. But maybe if you created a file (on the > target) called, for example, /etc/opkg/nfs.conf which contained: > > src/gz nfs /path/to/nfs > > maybe that would work? Don't forget to perform an "# opkg update" > after creating that file. > After some trial-and-error (and remembering to call opkg-cl update as you suggested) I was able to get my alternative feed to work. So at this point, I *think* I have it all figured out ;-) Thanks to those on the list who offered their suggestions! > There's also a remote chance adding this new repository doesn't appear > to work because your target filesystem is full. I've noticed that in > the past, and opkg doesn't provide much in the way of feedback if/when > this happens. _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto