On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Nathan Rossi <nathan.ro...@xilinx.com>wrote:
> Reverting this commit on the top of master results in a functional build. > I've done some 'bitbake -e' scanning with and without the above commit, and > I cannot see any differences between the variables that are changed in the > meta-xilinx .bbappends files. So it does not appear to be a problem in > non-inclusion of the bbappend files, and the ordering of the inclusion > appears to be correct as well. > > Before I dive any deeper into the bitbake change itself I was hoping > someone might have seen this issue previously or has some insight. > just a wild guess... but could it be because gcc-cross and gcc-cross-initial both start with 'gcc-cross', hence the regexp in this new commit is catching them twice? i am referring to this: - if f in self.appendlist: - return self.appendlist[f] - return [] + for bbappend in self.appendlist: + if bbappend in f or ('%' in bbappend and bbappend.startswith(f[:bbappend.index('%')])): + self.appliedappendlist.append(bbappend) + for filename in self.appendlist[bbappend]: + filelist.append(filename)
_______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto