On 14-04-11 03:02 AM, Vali Cobelea wrote:
Hi Diego,

Thank you for your interest in the meta-cgl layer.
Please be aware that the layer is in its alpha state, as I said an
initiative that started with a layer.

The branch is 'master', no custom things yet.
Below you can find the instructions to clone all of the "dependency layers":

git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-qt3
<http://twiki.enea.se/twiki/bin/edit/Git://git/yoctoproject/org/Meta-qt3?topicparent=EETeng.EneaLinuxCGLBuildInstructions;nowysiwyg=0>
git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-virtualization
<http://twiki.enea.se/twiki/bin/edit/Git://git/yoctoproject/org/Meta-virtualization?topicparent=EETeng.EneaLinuxCGLBuildInstructions;nowysiwyg=0>
git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-selinux
<http://twiki.enea.se/twiki/bin/edit/Git://git/yoctoproject/org/Meta-selinux?topicparent=EETeng.EneaLinuxCGLBuildInstructions;nowysiwyg=0>
git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-cloud-services
<http://twiki.enea.se/twiki/bin/edit/Git://git/yoctoproject/org/Meta-cloud-services?topicparent=EETeng.EneaLinuxCGLBuildInstructions;nowysiwyg=0>
git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-security
<http://twiki.enea.se/twiki/bin/edit/Git://git/yoctoproject/org/Meta-security?topicparent=EETeng.EneaLinuxCGLBuildInstructions;nowysiwyg=0>
git clonehttps://github.com/joaohf/meta-openclovis.git

Also, since there are duplicated recipes in these layers, please add the
following BBMASK in cong/local.conf  (big thank you to Alex Vaduva for
this):

BBMASK =
"meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack/recipes-support/lvm2|meta-security/recipes-security/libcap-ng"


What exactly are you finding with lvm2 in meta-cloud-services ?

Bruce


Let me know how the test goes Deigo.


Best regards,
Vali

On 04/11/2014 12:35 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote:

Vali,

I'm excited to see CGL support for Yocto.
I'm going to test this layer as soon as possible.

One question, which branch of Yocto is it based on?

Regards,

--
*dS
Diego Sueiro
sent from mobile.

On Apr 9, 2014 11:05 AM, "Vali Cobelea" <valentin.cobe...@enea.com
<mailto:valentin.cobe...@enea.com>> wrote:

    OK Paul, that indeed makes sense, I really did not knew that
    preliminary versions of layers are accepted.
    I will discuss around here and if everything goes OK we will start
    the move in the "public" layer index.
    I also do agree with an all-together strategy, no matter for the
    layer state.


    Much appreciated,
    Vali


    On 04/09/2014 02:01 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:

        On Wednesday 09 April 2014 13:55:47 Vali Cobelea wrote:

            On 04/09/2014 01:51 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:

                On Tuesday 08 April 2014 18:34:08 Vali Cobelea wrote:

                    Here at ENEA we decided to take the initiative
                    regarding the CGL
                    compliance when it comes to the Yocto Project.
                    For this we started the work on a dedicated layer
                    called 'meta-cgl'

                    which can be accessed / cloned from here:
                    http://git.enea.com/git/?p=linux/meta-cgl.git
                        git clone g...@git.enea.com:linux/meta-cgl

                    Have a look of the things we got there so far,
                    please remember that
                    there is still plenty of work to be done (layer
                    architecture, CGL
                    requirements coverage mode and so on).
                    It is a little bit more than a stub layer,
                    consider it a starting point
                    for the direction we would like to have with this
                    layer.

                    Any input is much appreciated, lets keep the
                    discussion by this email
                    thread and see where it goes.

                I don't have anything to offer on the layer contents,
                but I would say in
                order to make it easy for people to find this layer I
                would strongly
                encourage you to>
                submit it to the OpenEmbedded layer index:
                http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/submit/

            Thank you for the input.
            We will keep the layer for a short period of time at the
            current
            location while getting other ideas regarding the content /
            architecture.
            The layer initiative will also be raised up in the board
            advisory
            meeting, in order to get even more input.
            After which we will make it easier to find, access and use
            for anyone,
            exactly as you suggested.

        OK, as the maintainer it's totally up to you.

        I would say though generally that I'd like to see more people
        adding their
        work-in-progress layers to the layer index, even if at some
        time later they
        will be moved elsewhere or absorbed into another layer - it
        just makes it
        easier to point people to the layer index so they can find
        recipes that have
        already been written, rather than having to re-write them from
        scratch.

        Cheers,
        Paul


    --
    _______________________________________________
    yocto mailing list
    yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org>
    https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto





--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to