On 14-04-30 06:24 AM, Neuer User wrote:
Hi Bruce
Have you got any further?
Your timing is good. I was preeempted by another issue yesterday, but
I have the fsl-imx layers cloned and am about to start a build. I'll
send a follow up when I know more.
Bruce
I currently use a "defconfig" replacement, but honestly, it feels very
dumb. Fragments seem to be much smarter to combine and test different
configurations.
Cheers
Michael
Am 28.04.2014 15:37, schrieb Bruce Ashfield:
On 14-04-28 09:35 AM, Neuer User wrote:
Am 28.04.2014 15:16, schrieb Bruce Ashfield:
It all depends on how adventurous you are today :) Using a defconfig
will work, and you can generate one without much trouble. Using
fragments will allow you to keep your changes separate from the
baseline configuration, but you'll need to tweak the recipe .. which
always carries a risk of some unexpected side effects.
I'm around to help regardless of which way you chose.
Cheers,
Bruce
Well, I looked at the linux-yocto file and tried a couple of
combinations in my bbappend. All of them geenrated lots of different
errors.
If you send me pointers to your bblayers and local.conf settings, I'll
run a build to see what happens here as well.
I'm always interested in tracking these down regardless.
Bruce
e.g. I used:
FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-${PV}:"
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_cubox-i = "(cubox-i)"
SRC_URI += "file://videoin.cfg"
addtask kernel_configme before do_configure after do_patch
# Pick up shared functions
inherit kernel
inherit kernel-yocto
#require linux-dtb.inc
# extra tasks
addtask kernel_configcheck after do_configure before do_compile
The error messages are too long to include here :-/
Guess, it is probably best to go the defconfig way.
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
