These two glossaries are not replicates of each other by design. You might notice also that some definitions for the same variable differ as well. The intent is to have the variables in ref-manual be specific (if possible) for YP and the ones in bitbake-user-manual to be specific for that context.
Scott >-----Original Message----- >From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day >Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 5:03 AM >To: Yocto discussion list >Subject: [yocto] should yocto ref manual variable glossary include bitbake >variables? > > > more pedantry -- reading both the bitbake user manual and the yocto >reference manual variable glossaries: > >http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake- >user-manual.html#ref-variables-glossary >http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#ref- >variables-glos > >and i notice, as a single example, the first mentions the variable >ASSUME_PROVIDED while the second does not. is this deliberate? is there an >explicit distinguishing of variables that belong to different layers of the >build >system across the variable glossaries in different manuals? > >rday > >-- > >=========================================================== >============= >Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA > http://crashcourse.ca > >Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday >LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday >=========================================================== >============= >-- >_______________________________________________ >yocto mailing list >yocto@yoctoproject.org >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
