On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 10:07 -0600, Michael Kotson wrote: > Hi all, > > We are trying to create a custom BSP based off of valleyisland-64 > using the yocto-bsp script. When we are presented choices for which > BSP to branch from, valleyisland isn’t one of the choices. We have > tried all of the different kernel options presented, but no luck. I’m > pretty sure we have the layers added correctly, as we can build > valleyisland-32 and valleyisland-64 inside of hob with no problems. > Any idea what we are doing wrong? >
Nothing that you're doing wrong, it's just that the valleyisland BSPs are built a little differently from the normal BSPs - instead of a machine branch, they do a merge of a valleyisland-io branch into another branch and the yocto-bsp tools aren't set up to do that. They'd need to be enhanced to enhanced to handle cases like that. I'd suggest filing a an enhancement bug so we can add that capability.. Thanks, Tom > > > All the best, > > Michael > > > > > > Michael Kotson > > Chief Technology Officer > > > > (Tel: (303) 412-2055 > > *E-Mail: mkot...@octagonsystems.com > > NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any document > attached hereto is intended only for the named recipient(s). If you > are not the intended recipient, nor the employee or agent responsible > for delivering this message in confidence to the intended > recipient(s), you are hereby notified that you have received this > transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution or > copying of this transmittal or its attachments is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, > please notify me immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this > message, including any attachments. > > > > -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto