in section 3.2 of the kernel dev manual, there is a discussion of KMACHINE and how it is *typically* set to the same value as MACHINE, but there are cases where that might not be true; however, the example used to demonstrate this -- emenlow and emenlow-noemgd -- doesn't seem appropriate as there is no "emenlow" machine definition file anymore in meta-intel. AFAICT, all of those non-noemgd machine definitions are gone.
in all the layers i have checked out, the only layer where i see KMACHINE covering a number of MACHINE values is meta-xilinx (zynq-based machines). it sounds picky but, when demonstrating some concept, i think it's important that examples used actually exist in the code base in case people want to check. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto