Hello Andrei, On 08/10/2015 11:34 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[snip] >>>>> >>> >>> That would definitely be the preferate way but would involve some additional >>> work in tracking the patches. So, as an initial state, I am fine with a >>> different kernel recipe (with a different name). >>> >> >> Ok, I was waiting for your feedback before preparing v2. > > I guess this is my feedback. We can go on a separate linux provider for now. > Something like linux-raspbery-vc.bb . Or, if you want to maintain the patches > we can only pull in patches and apply them on top of 4.X based on a FEATURE. > What do you think? > Yes, sorry I meant that I didn't post a v2 before because I was waiting for you but now I've all your feedback from your previous emails. I agree that is better to have a separate recipe (with all the patches unconditionally applied) and drop the feature for now. Is just that I was busy today with other stuff but I'll post a v2 this week for sure! > -- > Andrei Gherzan > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto